|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Tony ElkaTony Elka Date: Apr 17, 2008 08:56
Sure there are similarities. Both existed on the same planet, were
subject to gravity, time etc.
But were there significant differences musically? I mean, when you
consider that the universe is infinite, and time goes on for eternity,
is there that much of a difference between anything?
Tony
|
| |
|
| | 34 Comments |
|
|
Author: Tracy_BarberTracy_Barber Date: Apr 17, 2008 12:46
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:56:52 -0700, Tony Elka
shadowlane.com> wrote:
>Sure there are similarities. Both existed on the same planet, were
>subject to gravity, time etc.
>
>But were there significant differences musically? I mean, when you
>consider that the universe is infinite, and time goes on for eternity,
>is there that much of a difference between anything?
Yes. The Monkees generally had vocals and Miles generally didn't.
Other than that, no.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: DaveDave Date: Apr 17, 2008 14:43
We thankfully haven't been treated to the release of
"The Complete Headquarters Sessions" and "The
Complete Pisces, Aquarius, Capricorn & Jones Ltd.
Sessions" box sets.
As far as I know.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Anthony NanceAnthony Nance Date: Apr 18, 2008 10:27
Tony Elka shadowlane.com> wrote:> Sure there are similarities. Both existed on the same planet, were
> subject to gravity, time etc.
>
> But were there significant differences musically? I mean, when you
> consider that the universe is infinite, and time goes on for eternity,
> is there that much of a difference between anything?
It's odd times like this where I am reminded of (and so enjoy) the fact
that Hendrix opened for the Monkees for a little while in 1967.
Tony
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tracy_BarberTracy_Barber Date: Apr 18, 2008 13:30
>Tony Elka shadowlane.com> wrote:>> Sure there are similarities. Both existed on the same planet, were
>> subject to gravity, time etc.
>>
>> But were there significant differences musically? I mean, when you
>> consider that the universe is infinite, and time goes on for eternity,
>> is there that much of a difference between anything?
>
>It's odd times like this where I am reminded of (and so enjoy) the fact
>that Hendrix opened for the Monkees for a little while in 1967.
Heh! Then again, Hendrix didn't have a weekly TV show.
|
| |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: Tony ElkaTony Elka Date: Apr 18, 2008 15:35
> Heh! Then again, Hendrix didn't have a weekly TV show.
Actually, he does. In a parallel universe where he lived and Barry
Manilow choked on his own vomit in 1970.
Janis Joplin is still a frequent guest. As is former President Robert
Kennedy.
Tony
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: VivaU.S.A.MVivaU.S.A.M Date: Apr 18, 2008 23:21
>>Tony Elka shadowlane.com> wrote:>>> Sure there are similarities. Both existed on the same planet, were
>>> subject to gravity, time etc.
>
>>> But were there significant differences musically? I mean, when you
>>> consider that the universe is infinite, and time goes on for eternity,
>>> is there that much of a difference between anything?
>
>>It's odd times like this where I am reminded of (and so enjoy) the fact
>>that Hendrix opened for the Monkees for a little while in 1967.
>
> Heh! Then again, Hendrix didn't have a weekly TV show.
At least Hendrix achieved high levels of Pioneering, creative,
thoughtful, original, and image provoking qualities to ORIGINAL
COMPOSITIONS, pushed Musical Boundaries beyond anyone I have EVER
HEARD (Don't...
|
| Show full article (3.10Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tony ElkaTony Elka Date: Apr 18, 2008 23:30
In article
w5g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
VivaU.S.A.M@gmail.com wrote:
> So don't even insult Miles Davis by comparing HIM to 'The Monkees'. At
> least Miles Davis and Jimi Hendrix were genuine, authentic, and
> ORIGINAL Song-writers/Composers, Recording Artists and Performers of
> that era. So broaden your Horizons, educate yourselves and listen to
> some even half decent quality Music, at least provide yourselves with
> a basic challenge and elevate and diversify your tastes... What a
> sacrilegious thought to even compare with such false statements in the
> art of Music!
And in the missing the complete point category, the award goes to
VivaU.S.A. !!!!
Tony
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Tracy_BarberTracy_Barber Date: Apr 19, 2008 06:30
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:30:00 -0700, Tony Elka
shadowlane.com> wrote:
>In article
> w5g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
> VivaU.S.A.M@gmail.com wrote:
>>> So don't even insult Miles Davis by comparing HIM to 'The Monkees'. At
>> least Miles Davis and Jimi Hendrix were genuine, authentic, and
>> ORIGINAL Song-writers/Composers, Recording Artists and Performers of
>> that era. So broaden your Horizons, educate yourselves and listen to
>> some even half decent quality Music, at least provide yourselves with
>> a basic challenge and elevate and diversify your tastes... What a
>> sacrilegious thought to even compare with such false statements in the
>> art of Music!
>
>
>
>And in the missing the complete point category, the award goes to
>VivaU.S.A. !!!!
|
| Show full article (0.83Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
