The Beatles were good but extremely boring
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
rec.music.progressive only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

rec.music.progressive Profile…
 Up
The Beatles were good but extremely boring         


Author: Raja
Date: Jul 28, 2008 09:02

When was the last time Beatles rocked? How many of their songs have
improvisations? Sure they could make tons of cutesy melodies and
harmonies. But that is not what I expect from a ROCK band. I need some
jaw dropping solos and riffs, some thunderous drumming and screaming
by the singer. In the pop and singer/songwriter world, Beatles are
unmatched. But how exciting were they? May be for the 60s they were
very exciting (and probably even hard rock for the early 60s) but
most of their songs nowadays sound like nursery rhymes or plain
constipated or "Hare Rama Hare Krishna" influenced snoozefests.

Inspite of making tons of songs with brilliant melodies, The Beatles
made only very few songs you can rock out to. That doesnt mean they
were not great. They were truly a great band, but extremely boring.

These are the only Beatles songs I can seriously rock out to.

Chronologically...
Show full article (1.79Kb)
66 Comments
Re: The Beatles were good but extremely boring         


Author: Eiron
Date: Jul 28, 2008 09:18

Raja wrote:
> When was the last time Beatles rocked? How many of their songs have
> improvisations? Sure they could make tons of cutesy melodies and
> harmonies. But that is not what I expect from a ROCK band. I need some
> jaw dropping solos and riffs, some thunderous drumming and screaming
> by the singer. In the pop and singer/songwriter world, Beatles are
> unmatched. But how exciting were they? May be for the 60s they were
> very exciting (and probably even hard rock for the early 60s) but
> most of their songs nowadays sound like nursery rhymes or plain
> constipated or "Hare Rama Hare Krishna" influenced snoozefests.

They were crap in the sixties and only appealed to tone-deaf girls.
My late father-in-law was in the Cavern club once and told them to
keep the noise down as some people were there for a quiet drink.
He appreciated good music....

--
Eiron.
no comments
Re: The Beatles were good but extremely boring         


Author: Gracchus
Date: Jul 28, 2008 09:22

On Jul 28, 11:02 am, Raja gmail.com> wrote:
> When was the last time Beatles rocked? How many of their songs have
> improvisations?

This really is a stupid post. It's like saying "Why weren't the
Beatles Led Zeppelin?" "Why can't jazz sound like rock?"

If you want to "rock out," listen to a different band. There's enough
loud garbage out there to entertain you for a lifetime.
no comments
Re: The Beatles were good but extremely boring         


Author: jason-catlin
Date: Jul 28, 2008 09:23

On Jul 28, 11:02 am, Raja gmail.com> wrote:
> When was the last time Beatles rocked? How many of their songs have
> improvisations? Sure they could make tons of cutesy melodies and
> harmonies. But that is not what I expect from a ROCK band. I need some
> jaw dropping solos and riffs, some thunderous drumming and screaming
> by the singer.  In the pop and singer/songwriter world, Beatles are
> unmatched. But how exciting were they? May be for the 60s they were
> very exciting (and probably even hard rock for the early 60s)  but
> most of their songs nowadays sound like nursery rhymes or plain
> constipated or "Hare Rama Hare Krishna" influenced snoozefests.
>
> Inspite of making tons of songs with brilliant melodies, The Beatles
> made only very few songs you can rock out to. That doesnt mean they
> were not great. They were truly a great band, but extremely boring.
>
> These are the only Beatles songs I can seriously rock out to.
>
> Chronologically...
>
> Album songs (14) ...
Show full article (2.05Kb)
no comments
Re: The Beatles were good but extremely boring         


Author: Raja
Date: Jul 28, 2008 09:29

On Jul 28, 11:22 am, Gracchus hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 28, 11:02 am, Raja gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> When was the last time Beatles rocked? How many of their songs have
>> improvisations?
>
> This really is a stupid post. It's like saying "Why weren't the
> Beatles Led Zeppelin?" "Why can't jazz sound like rock?"

I didnt say that. Led Zeppelin werent the only rock band which rocked.
There were many.
>
> If you want to "rock out," listen to a different band. There's enough
> loud garbage out there to entertain you for a lifetime.

Loud garbage? You dont have to be loud to rock.
no comments
Re: The Beatles were good but extremely boring         


Author: Joe Ramirez
Date: Jul 28, 2008 09:34

On Jul 28, 12:29 pm, Raja gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 28, 11:22 am, Gracchus hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 28, 11:02 am, Raja gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> When was the last time Beatles rocked? How many of their songs have
>>> improvisations?
>
>> This really is a stupid post. It's like saying "Why weren't the
>> Beatles Led Zeppelin?" "Why can't jazz sound like rock?"
>
> I didnt say that. Led Zeppelin werent the only rock band which rocked.
> There were many.
>
>
>
>> If you want to "rock out," listen to a different band. There's enough
>> loud garbage out there to entertain you for a lifetime.
>
> Loud garbage? You dont have to be loud to rock. ...
Show full article (1.06Kb)
no comments
Re: The Beatles were good but extremely boring         


Author: VestMusicCheetah3
Date: Jul 28, 2008 09:36

On Jul 28, 12:23�pm, jason-cat...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Jul 28, 11:02�am, Raja gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> When was the last time Beatles rocked? How many of their songs have
>> improvisations? Sure they could make tons of cutesy melodies and
>> harmonies. But that is not what I expect from a ROCK band. I need some
>> jaw dropping solos and riffs, some thunderous drumming and screaming
>> by the singer. �In the pop and singer/songwriter world, Beatles are
>> unmatched. But how exciting were they? May be for the 60s they were
>> very exciting (and probably even hard rock for the early 60s) �but
>> most of their songs nowadays sound like nursery rhymes or plain
>> constipated or "Hare Rama Hare Krishna" influenced snoozefests.
>
>> Inspite of making tons of songs with brilliant melodies, The Beatles
>> made only very few songs you can rock out to. That doesnt mean they
>> were not great. They were truly a great band, but extremely boring. ...
Show full article (1.31Kb)
no comments
Re: The Beatles were good but extremely boring         


Author: Martin Hofner
Date: Jul 28, 2008 09:39

On Jul 28, 12:36 pm, VestMusicCheet...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Jul 28, 12:23�pm, jason-cat...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Jul 28, 11:02�am, Raja gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> When was the last time Beatles rocked? How many of their songs have
>>> improvisations? Sure they could make tons of cutesy melodies and
>>> harmonies. But that is not what I expect from a ROCK band. I need some
>>> jaw dropping solos and riffs, some thunderous drumming and screaming
>>> by the singer. �In the pop and singer/songwriter world, Beatles are
>>> unmatched. But how exciting were they? May be for the 60s they were
>>> very exciting (and probably even hard rock for the early 60s) �but
>>> most of their songs nowadays sound like nursery rhymes or plain
>>> constipated or "Hare Rama Hare Krishna" influenced snoozefests.
>
>>> Inspite of making tons of songs with brilliant melodies, The Beatles ...
Show full article (1.57Kb)
no comments
Re: The Beatles were good but extremely boring         


Author: Gracchus
Date: Jul 28, 2008 09:39

On Jul 28, 11:29 am, Raja gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 28, 11:22 am, Gracchus hotmail.com> wrote:
>> This really is a stupid post. It's like saying "Why weren't the
>> Beatles Led Zeppelin?" "Why can't jazz sound like rock?"
>
> I didnt say that. Led Zeppelin werent the only rock band which rocked.
> There were many.

It wasn't the Beatles' forte. They were composers and craftsmen
primaril
--obviously none of them were instrumental virtuosos, nor did
they ever pretend to be. Labeling them "boring" for this makes no
sense at all.
no comments
Re: The Beatles were good but extremely boring         


Author: Raja
Date: Jul 28, 2008 09:45

On Jul 28, 11:34 am, Joe Ramirez netzero.com> wrote:
> On Jul 28, 12:29 pm, Raja gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Jul 28, 11:22 am, Gracchus hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> On Jul 28, 11:02 am, Raja gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>> When was the last time Beatles rocked? How many of their songs have
>>>> improvisations?
>
>>> This really is a stupid post. It's like saying "Why weren't the
>>> Beatles Led Zeppelin?" "Why can't jazz sound like rock?"
>
>> I didnt say that. Led Zeppelin werent the only rock band which rocked.
>> There were many.
> ...
Show full article (1.23Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7