Re: The 7 most successful bands of the 60s and 70s in terms of ALBUM chart success in US and UK
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
rec.music.progressive only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: The 7 most successful bands of the 60s and 70s in terms of ALBUM chart success in US and UK         

Group: rec.music.progressive · Group Profile
Author: Raja
Date: May 9, 2008 13:13

On May 9, 9:05 am, Jeff sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On May 9, 7:54 am, Raja gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On May 9, 4:38 am, Jeff sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>> On May 8, 8:33 pm, zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>>>> On May 8, 8:23 pm, poisoned rose definitive.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>>> Presumably, it involved once again just counting on
>>>>>>> his fingers how many times the bands appeared on such-and-such weblists,
>>>>>>> without taking into account WHERE they rank on the lists.
>
>>>>>> How many top 10 albums did Fleetwood Mac have in the UK and US?
>>>>>> The Eagles were even worse.
>
>>>>> Thank you for clarifying my speculation.
>
>>>>> So, a 19-times-platinum album represents no more "success" in your book
>>>>> than a gold one.
>
>>>>> Nothing more needs to be said.
>
>>>> Sorry, I am not talking sales figures here. Sales figures are well
>>>> know. Anyone can check RIAA and print out the top 7 bands from the 60s
>>>> and 70s. Careful, it might have Journey.
>
>>>>>>>> Pull up top albums sales *worldwide,* based on *sales,* not chart
>>>>>>>> position, and you'll be able to see the the raja boy made most of his
>>>>>>>> stuff up.
>
>>>>>>> It's clear that he tipped the scales toward his usual UK faves by
>>>>>>> stressing US and UK chart success equally, without taking into account
>>>>>>> that the US is a much larger market.
>
>>>>>> doesnt matter. I am thinking of global bands. Bands who are successful
>>>>>> here but flop in UK dont count and vice versa.
>
>>>>> You're not making an argument of any merit. You're simply stacking the
>>>>> deck again.
>
>>>>> If an album "successfully" sells 10 million in the States and
>>>>> "unsuccessfully" sells 50,000 in the UK, it's still more successful than
>>>>> an album which "successfully" sold 2 million in the States and
>>>>> "successfully" sold 300,000 in the UK. It's simple math.
>
>>>> Again you are going back to sales figures. I am talking about chart
>>>> success. I am talking about how bands were in demand enough to scale
>>>> the charts.
>
>>> So, you're saying that sales figures don't show what bands were in
>>> demand???- Hide quoted text -
>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>
>> I am saying sales figures are all wrong.- Hide quoted text -
>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> How can sales figures be wrong?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

How can they be right? You think people were counting how many copies
Please Please Me sold in 1963 in each and every corner of the world?
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!