On May 9, 9:05Â am, Jeff sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On May 9, 7:54Â am, Raja gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On May 9, 4:38Â am, Jeff sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>> On May 8, 8:33Â pm, zepflo...@
yahoo.com wrote:
>
>>>> On May 8, 8:23Â pm, poisoned rose
definitive.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Presumably, it involved once again just counting on
>>>>>>> his fingers how many times the bands appeared on such-and-such weblists,
>>>>>>> without taking into account WHERE they rank on the lists.
>
>>>>>> How many top 10 albums did Fleetwood Mac have in the UK and US?
>>>>>> The Eagles were even worse.
>
>>>>> Thank you for clarifying my speculation.
>
>>>>> So, a 19-times-platinum album represents no more "success" in your book
>>>>> than a gold one.
>
>>>>> Nothing more needs to be said.
>
>>>> Sorry, I am not talking sales figures here. Sales figures are well
>>>> know. Anyone can check RIAA and print out the top 7 bands from the 60s
>>>> and 70s. Careful, it might have Journey.
>
>>>>>>>> Pull up top albums sales *worldwide,* based on *sales,* not chart
>>>>>>>> position, and you'll be able to see the the raja boy made most of his
>>>>>>>> stuff up.
>
>>>>>>> It's clear that he tipped the scales toward his usual UK faves by
>>>>>>> stressing US and UK chart success equally, without taking into account
>>>>>>> that the US is a much larger market.
>
>>>>>> doesnt matter. I am thinking of global bands. Bands who are successful
>>>>>> here but flop in UK dont count and vice versa.
>
>>>>> You're not making an argument of any merit. You're simply stacking the
>>>>> deck again.
>
>>>>> If an album "successfully" sells 10 million in the States and
>>>>> "unsuccessfully" sells 50,000 in the UK, it's still more successful than
>>>>> an album which "successfully" sold 2 million in the States and
>>>>> "successfully" sold 300,000 in the UK. It's simple math.
>
>>>> Again you are going back to sales figures. I am talking about chart
>>>> success. I am talking about how bands were in demand enough to scale
>>>> the charts.
>
>>> So, you're saying that sales figures don't show what bands were in
>>> demand???- Hide quoted text -
>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>
>> I am saying sales figures are all wrong.- Hide quoted text -
>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> How can sales figures be wrong?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
How can they be right? You think people were counting how many copies
Please Please Me sold in 1963 in each and every corner of the world?