> This

> This band lists the top 1000 classic rock songs of all time
>
> I tried to find the rock bands which have at least 5 songs in the top
> 500. Only few made it...
>
> Led Zeppelin has the most songs at 22 in the top 500
>
> http://www.thedigitallife.net/top1000.htm
>
>
> Rank Song Artist
> 20 You Shook Me All Night Long AC/DC
> 36 It's A Long Way to the Top AC/DC
> 74 Back In Black AC/DC
> 89 Dirty Deeds AC/DC
> 226 Highway To Hell AC/DC
> 427 Girls Got Rhythm AC/DC
> AC/DC Count 6
> 16 Dream On Aerosmith ...

>
> Led Zeppelin has the most songs at 22 in the top 500
>

> This band lists the top 1000 classic rock songs of all time
>
> I tried to find the rock bands which have at least 5 songs in the top
> 500. Only few made it...
>
> Led Zeppelin has the most songs at 22 in the top 500
>
> http://www.thedigitallife.net/top1000.htm
>
>
> Rank Song Artist
> 20 You Shook Me All Night Long AC/DC
> 36 It's A Long Way to the Top AC/DC
> 74 Back In Black AC/DC
> 89 Dirty Deeds AC/DC
> 226 Highway To Hell AC/DC
> 427 Girls Got Rhythm AC/DC
> AC/DC Count 6 ...

>
> Everyone seems to have missed the fact that The Beatles have more songs on
> this, another silly Rajadolt list, than Zeppelin.
>
> Beatles: 26
> Zep: 22
>
> Then again, literacy was never Rajadolt's strong suit.

> yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1188608682.543089.27240@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>

>> This band lists the top 1000 classic rock songs of all time

>

>> I tried to find the rock bands which have at least 5 songs in the top
>> 500. Only few made it...

>

>> Led Zeppelin has the most songs at 22 in the top 500

>

>>http://www.thedigitallife.net/top1000.htm

>

>> Rank Song Artist
>> 20 You Shook Me All Night Long AC/DC ...

>>
>> Everyone seems to have missed the fact that The Beatles have more songs on
>> this, another silly Rajadolt list, than Zeppelin.
>>
>> Beatles: 26
>> Zep: 22
>>
>> Then again, literacy was never Rajadolt's strong suit.

>
> I think perhaps a PowerPoint presentation on the subject would be the
> best way to put the whole "classic rock songs" thing into perspective.
> Color the "Beatles" black and color "Led Zeppelin" pink, for example.
> Either a pie chart or bar chart would suffice to illustrate the
> differences. I'm pretty good with Photoshop, too, so I'd be happy to
> contribute a "rockin" background template. The slideshow could then be
> posted to YouTube, etc. so that every fan would know exactly where any
> given song stands relative to every other song...

>I think perhaps a PowerPoint presentation on the subject would be the
>best way to put the whole "classic rock songs" thing into perspective.
>Color the "Beatles" black and color "Led Zeppelin" pink, for example.
>Either a pie chart or bar chart would suffice to illustrate the
>differences. I'm pretty good with Photoshop, too, so I'd be happy to
>contribute a "rockin" background template. The slideshow could then be
>posted to YouTube, etc. so that every fan would know exactly where any
>given song stands relative to every other song. Is it "better"? More
>"rockin"? You get the idea. Anyway, no more doubts.

> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:46:42 -0400, abe slaney
> itagain.com> wrote:
>

>>I think perhaps a PowerPoint presentation on the subject would be the
>>best way to put the whole "classic rock songs" thing into perspective.
>>Color the "Beatles" black and color "Led Zeppelin" pink, for example.
>>Either a pie chart or bar chart would suffice to illustrate the
>>differences. I'm pretty good with Photoshop, too, so I'd be happy to
>>contribute a "rockin" background template. The slideshow could then be
>>posted to YouTube, etc. so that every fan would know exactly where any
>>given song stands relative to every other song. Is it "better"? More
>>"rockin"? You get the...