> On Nov 3, 2:16?pm, Peter rock.com> sputtered:
>
>
>
>
>

>> On Nov 3, 4:27 pm, Steven Sullivan panix.com> wrote:

>

>>> In alt.music.yes Peter rock.com> wrote:

>

>>>> On Nov 2, 7:21 pm, "robm...@aol.com" aol.com> wrote:

>>>>>>What did they "lie" to you about?

>

>>>>> action they would take to resolve an issue with an order...as if you
>>>>> have any real business asking.

>>>> I see. So we could equally conclude that it was you that made some
>>>> sort of mistake, and acted like a dick to them - as you here on a
>>>> daily basis - and as a result they did something different than you
>>>> wanted to solve the error you created.

>>>>> Rob "those are your words, not mine" Allen

>>>> "Voiceprint openly lied to me and ripped me off" - RA Nov .1

>

>>> Voiceprint's an outfit that both Rob Allen and Henry Potts
>>> independently agree on as being shoddy.

>

>>> Think about that, Peter.

>

>>> ___
>>> -S
>>> "As human beings, we understand the world through simile, analogy,
>>> metaphor, narrative and, sometimes, claymation." - B. Mason

>

>> That Henry agrees adds credibility to the argument.

>
> Certainly _you_ questioning "credibility" is beyond hilairous, _i_.
>

>>Rob's claim to "boycott" without providing any details is dumb.

>
> My suggestion that the buyer beware is equally dumb...but let's face
> it, _i_, I've got no formal education...and apart from that, I'm
> frequently wrong and don't understand much of what I know.
>

>>I haven't seen
>> Henry's complaints, but I expect that he has given more reasonable
>> explanations, as is his wont. However, I have ordered from them at
>> least a half dozen times and have received what I ordered in good
>> shape and in reasonably timely fashion.

>
> wow..."at least a half dozen"...you're clearly one of those _cliente
> regulars_.
>

>>What few communications I have
>> had with them have been clear, concise and professional.

>
> uh...a half dozen purchases with a "few" (is that somewhere around
> three?) communications? I guess on that measure I've had better
> experience with Voiceprint...I think my first half dozen (at least)
> purchases required _no_ communication beyond placing the order.
>
> Meanwhile, after that auto-email melee that spewed out of Vocieprint,
> I don't know how anyone, even a shittalking usenet crank, could
> suggest that they might consistently communicate in the manner you
> suggest.
>

>> I attribute some of the issues (the late arrival of the ABWH cover and
>> the less than stellar Animation) on band members who are not paying
>> attention to their customers. The covers certainly sat in someones
>> house for weeks on end, while Jon could have insisted on Animation
>> being up to snuff before letting it out, as Chris has done with FOOW.
>> Voiceprint has little or no control over those types of issues.

>
> Voiceprint has full control over being sure they can deliver as
> advertised. The _problem_ with the ABWH release was fully on
> Voiceprint. I don't know the details of the _Animation_ release, so I
> don't know what's on who with that one.
>
> Meanwhile, you've gone from "not a single problem" to _the problems
> are not Voiceprint's fault_, in just a few posts. Funny stuff, _i_.
>
> Ok, so you've had some problems...minor problems in my book...and
> certainly nothing that I would call a rip off, or openly dishonest.
> See, Voiceprint actually had to do some ripping off for me to call
> that. They actually had to deny thier own words, and then deny them
> again after being presented with proof in the form of their own
> correspondence, for me to say that they openly lied.
>
> But forget that stuff...watching you dance on this is pretty funny. I
> think I'd like to see you trot out for at *least* a couple more
> numbers.
>
> Rob "that guy bet six times and won pretty much every time" Allen- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -