http://www.dprp.net/longsongs/longsongs.php

On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:24:59 +0000, Eiron hotmail.com> wrote:

Of which, he may have heard only between 3 - 5, tops.

On Dec 26, 2:24 pm, Eiron hotmail.com> wrote:

I am not such a big prog nut yet. By the way why are Led Zeppelin/The
Who/Beatles not prog? Is it because they didnt make 20 minute songs?

Led-Yes-Pin-Bea-Rol wrote:

Led Zeppelin was a blues based rock band which was a bit proggy at times,
and had a few 20-minutes songs, at least when played live.
The Who was also a bit proggy at times, or rather psychedelic,
around the time of 'Sell Out'.
And The Beatles were a bunch of whiny scousers who made dreadful
three-minute pop songs for tone-deaf teenage girls, with funny noises
added by George Martin.

HTH.

On Dec 27 2007, 3:57 am, Eiron hotmail.com> wrote:

Zep was progressive blues rock IMO. Canned Heat were blues rock. No
Led Zep! They were much more than that.

I would agree to that. But I think Tommy and Quadrophenia are quite
progressive. Quadrophenia is in fact very prog and very SHITTY too.