Re: 1967 the greatest year for rock music
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
rec.music.progressive only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: 1967 the greatest year for rock music         

Group: rec.music.progressive · Group Profile
Author: amy
Date: Apr 28, 2008 15:40

On Apr 27, 3:01 am, tension_on_the_wire yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Apr 26, 12:53 pm, poisoned rose rmb.com> wrote:
>
>> I always have a difficult time with this question, because of the
>> quality vs. quantity issue. I could pull a Raja, and simply base my view
>> on "counting" how many albums I like from given years. But that would
>> duplicate Raja's usual problem of not measuring internal quality. But
>> which is better, a year with 15 great albums and 60 good ones, or a year
>> with 30 great albums and 30 good ones? Beats me. That's the relevant
>> sort of question for me.
>
>> One thing's for sure: My interests really explode in 1986, which I
>> believe is coincident with the alt-rock world breaking out as a
>> flourishing movement and giving far more acts the chance to record.
>> That's the point where I abruptly jump from being interested in 60 or so
>> albums a year to well over a hundred. So, it's especially hard for me to
>> compare 1986-??? with ???-1985.
>
> How about the idea that maybe it's neither quantifiable nor
> qualifiable because at the end of the day, your personal assessment of
> great and good albums is so entirely subjective it would be like
> trying to read your fingerprints.  Everybody might actually be
> defining the greatest year of music as the year in which the available
> music played an important role as the soundrack of your life.  It's as
> personal as the story of your life.  Don't you remember what the
> dominant music was for most of the momentous milestones in your life?
> When you hear that music again, after a long time, you can have an
> instant flashback of total recall sometimes, if the experiences were
> significant.  When and where they are may have a lot to do with the
> time and place of the music that you were most receptive to, even.
> But perhaps you perceive music more intellectually, and not so
> personally?  In which case you may be impervious to it's influence on
> your vantage point.
>
> But if not, it may take only one superlative album amidst a pile of
> tripe shining like a pearl amongst swine to make it the best year for
> music since the Gregorian monks sat down and had a drink together.
>
> --tension

Please don't use words like "personal" "subjective" or "vantage point"
in front of Raja his head will explode.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!