>On Sep 3, 3:48 pm, Mike Dickson geemail.com> wrote:

>> Raja wrote:

>>>> How is this list "accurate" and "reasonable" beyond having the first
>>>> dozen or so be the usual suspects, whuich anyone could have achieved.

>>

>>> Well the usual suspects are there, so fairly reasonable.

>>
>> In other words it's the same old shit as before. And before that. And
>> before that. And before that. And before that. And before that. And
>> before that. And before that. And before that. And before that. And
>> before that. And before that. And before that. And before that. And
>> before that. And before that. And before that. And before that. And
>> before that. And before that. And before that. And before that.
>>
>> What the fuck is actually /wrong/ with you?
>>
>> --
>> Mike Dickson, Edinburgh
>>
>> Free Music Project:http://www.last.fm/music/Mike+Dickson
>> Orhttp://www.mikedickson.org.uk/

>
>You shld be asking that to the mirror. Why post, when you have nothing
>positive to say?