>On Sep 2, 9:36 am, Tracy_Bar...@frontiernet.net wrote:

>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:55:22 -0500, Dale Houstman skypoint.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>

>>>Raja wrote:

>>>> Quite accurate list, this...

>>

>>>What does "accurate" mean in a subjective evaluation?

>>
>> Because he dreams that it is official.
>>

>>>Why not make it the "3000 greatest British Invasion artists, and then it
>>>is bound to be "accurate".

>>
>> We already had this a little before 1776.
>>

>>>Even 150 is obviously too long to ensure that the choices will actually
>>>represent enduring quality: many of these are obscure, and I'm certain
>>>wouldn't really top anyone's idea of "great". The list begins to sputter
>>>out around 33 or so, and before that the information is basically common
>>>coin stuff. Hardly interesting to anyone who knows even the slightests
>>>thing about the musical scene of the time.

>>
>> Coffee table discussions...
>>

>>>So what's the point? Trying to bore us all to death so you can break
>>>into our homes and steal our Velveeta?

>>
>> Yep.  His 7-Eleven is almost belly up in the bathtub and he needs more
>> supplies.

>
>How is the cotton picking on the plantation??