they stop making songs with women singing in such high pitch tones.

It sounds like alvin & the chimpmunks in this day and age.

Have women singing in more natural voice tones and Indian songs will
become globally much more appreciated.

fruitella wrote:

What do you mean by global appreciation?

fruitella wrote:

It would also be good if they stuck to actual notes in the chromatic
scale. Westerners cringe when we hear sound frequencies in between
chromatic notes.

That Sting song with the Hindustani woman is awful.

I don't know what the chromatic scale is but Desert Rose was sung by an
Algerian singer by the name of Cheb.

And if its so awful, how come it was played on the radio so often and
people bought the album?

Terry Lomax wrote:

No way, natural tones are not so high pitch. Its like a 3 year old
girl screaming half the time. They need to reduce the pitch and
increase the bass.. or is it base?

Animesh K wrote:

Ketan wrote:

Pst Pst Pst...Ketan, you assume/doubt too many things ;)

KCP

Animesh K wrote:

I'm not telling YOU anything. I'm stating some basic facts. The fact
is that high pitch squealing is not pleasant to human ears. One or two
songs having that bee gees tone is ok. If every song has that voice
tone, it begins to get annoying.

A natural woman's voice is preferable to a 3 yr old screaming.

This is called constructive criticism.

fruitella wrote:

Aha, some contradictions! You were telling that the singers *need to*; and I
wanted to tell you that there is no need to (dictate my or the singers' choice).

You wrote this in your previous post:

fruitella wrote:

Look dude, screaming in a high pitch is just plain irritating.

If a few women want to sing like the bee gees, that's fine. When
every woman begins to sound like the bee gees in an Indian song, that
just is not cool.

Now you can go on with this pointless banter or you can accept that I
have a point. A warm smooth woman's voice is just more pleasant
sounding than high pitch squealing. And that is all I got to say.

Animesh K wrote:

fruitella wrote:

Everyone can have a point. However, arguments go with *logical* point. You make
many statements and you have no backup or explanation for them.

In first post, you argued about some undefined "global popularity". In second,
you made that "high base (sic) is a *need". In the third post, you post a new
claim: "high pitch is just plain irritating".

Just sit and think: High base (sic) is a need for whom? High is pitch is plain
irritating for whom? Who needs high base (sic)?