|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Raymond HallRaymond Hall Date: Oct 3, 2006 17:08
Am deciding as to whether to get Collard's Faure's piano works, or, as I
have read in some reviews, investigate Kathryn Stott's complete Faure
survey. One review indicates that Stott leaves Collard in the dust.
Any opinions from those who have heard Stott, or admire this pianist? On
Hyperion I think. I have often felt that Collard might be a bit dry,
brittle, technically brilliant of course, for this delicately shaded music.
Maybe Stott is the answer.
Ta.
Ray H
Taree, NSW
|
| |
|
| | 9 Comments |
|
  |
Author: jrsnfldjrsnfld Date: Oct 3, 2006 17:07
Raymond Hall wrote:
> Am deciding as to whether to get Collard's Faure's piano works, or, as I
> have read in some reviews, investigate Kathryn Stott's complete Faure
> survey. One review indicates that Stott leaves Collard in the dust.
>
> Any opinions from those who have heard Stott, or admire this pianist? On
> Hyperion I think. I have often felt that Collard might be a bit dry,
> brittle, technically brilliant of course, for this delicately shaded music.
> Maybe Stott is the answer.
>
> Ta.
>
> Ray H
> Taree, NSW
I don't know Stott, but Collard's Faure has served me decently for a
long time. Yet everytime I get someone else's (Marguerite Long, Kun-Woo
Paik, etc.) I remember that no single pianist has a corner on this
musi
--particularly Collard!
--Jeff
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: alanwatkinsukalanwatkinsuk Date: Oct 3, 2006 17:38
Raymond Hall wrote:
> Am deciding as to whether to get Collard's Faure's piano works, or, as I
> have read in some reviews, investigate Kathryn Stott's complete Faure
> survey. One review indicates that Stott leaves Collard in the dust.
>
> Any opinions from those who have heard Stott, or admire this pianist? On
> Hyperion I think. I have often felt that Collard might be a bit dry,
> brittle, technically brilliant of course, for this delicately shaded music.
> Maybe Stott is the answer.
>
> Ta.
>
> Ray H
> Taree, NSW
Personal opinion: if you want lots of wash of sound and pedal that
isn't written go for Hyperion and Ms Stott.
If you want what the composer actually wrote go for Collard.
I cannot say who leaves who in the dust but I know which one of them
actually plays what the composer wrote.
|
| Show full article (0.96Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: gperkins151gperkins151 Date: Oct 3, 2006 19:27
Raymond Hall wrote:
> Am deciding as to whether to get Collard's Faure's piano works, or, as I
> have read in some reviews, investigate Kathryn Stott's complete Faure
> survey. One review indicates that Stott leaves Collard in the dust.
>
> Any opinions from those who have heard Stott, or admire this pianist? On
> Hyperion I think. I have often felt that Collard might be a bit dry,
> brittle, technically brilliant of course, for this delicately shaded music.
> Maybe Stott is the answer.
>
> Ta.
>
> Ray H
> Taree, NSW
|
| Show full article (1.15Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Steve EmersonSteve Emerson Date: Oct 3, 2006 20:20
In article news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
"Raymond Hall" bigpond.com> wrote:
> Am deciding as to whether to get Collard's Faure's piano works, or, as I
> have read in some reviews, investigate Kathryn Stott's complete Faure
> survey. One review indicates that Stott leaves Collard in the dust.
>
> Any opinions from those who have heard Stott, or admire this pianist? On
> Hyperion I think. I have often felt that Collard might be a bit dry,
> brittle, technically brilliant of course, for this delicately shaded music.
> Maybe Stott is the answer.
Hi Ray, somebody asked this exact question here about 6 weeks ago.
SE.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: alanwatkinsukalanwatkinsuk Date: Oct 4, 2006 13:47
Richard Schultz wrote:
> In article <1159922338.968930.176840@ m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>, alanwatkinsuk@ aol.com aol.com> wrote:
>
> : If you want what the composer actually wrote go for Collard.
>
> I very, very sincerely hope that that is not true. Otherwise, I will have
> to seriously reconsider my placement (dating back some 30 years) of
> Faure on my list of My Favorite Composers.
>
> Unless this is the same thread resurrected somehow, there was a discussion
> of Stott vs. Collard in this very newsfroup a few months ago. Perhaps
> the OP should check what was said then for additional insights.
>
> -----
> Richard Schultz schultr@mail.biu.ac.il
Of course, but if a direct comparison between Ms Stott and Mr Collard
was what was asked for I'll stand by my personal opinion. Faure I
think an elusive composer and no one, probably, is going to get it all
|
| Show full article (1.64Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: tomdeacontomdeacon Date: Oct 4, 2006 13:56
> Richard Schultz wrote:
>> In article <1159922338.968930.176840@ m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>, alanwatkinsuk@ aol.com aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> : If you want what the composer actually wrote go for Collard.
>>
>> I very, very sincerely hope that that is not true. Otherwise, I will have
>> to seriously reconsider my placement (dating back some 30 years) of
>> Faure on my list of My Favorite Composers.
>>
>> Unless this is the same thread resurrected somehow, there was a discussion
>> of Stott vs. Collard in this very newsfroup a few months ago. Perhaps
>> the OP should check what was said then for additional insights.
>>
>> -----
>> Richard Schultz schultr@mail.biu.ac.il
>
>
> Of course, but if a direct comparison between Ms Stott and Mr Collard
> was what was asked for I'll stand by my personal opinion. Faure I ...
|
| Show full article (2.55Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Gregory ArkadinGregory Arkadin Date: Oct 4, 2006 14:10
If you go into any Barnes and Noble, you can
> sample tons of each set. That's how I made my eventual decision anyway.
B&N carries the Collard set? I've never been to one that had any
Brilliant boxes.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: gperkins151gperkins151 Date: Oct 4, 2006 16:33
Gregory Arkadin wrote:
> If you go into any Barnes and Noble, you can
>> sample tons of each set. That's how I made my eventual decision anyway.
>
> B&N carries the Collard set? I've never been to one that had any
> Brilliant boxes.
They didn't have it, but they had many samples on their listening
stations.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Phil CaronPhil Caron Date: Oct 4, 2006 17:52
> Am deciding as to whether to get Collard's Faure's piano works, or, as I
> have read in some reviews, investigate Kathryn Stott's complete Faure
> survey. One review indicates that Stott leaves Collard in the dust.
>
> Any opinions from those who have heard Stott, or admire this pianist? On
> Hyperion I think. I have often felt that Collard might be a bit dry,
> brittle, technically brilliant of course, for this delicately shaded
> music. Maybe Stott is the answer.
>
> Ta.
>
I like the Collard set. It didn't strike me as dry. The Stott is unknown
to me.
A different and interesting style in Faure is that of Grant Johanneson. The
music permits suprising interpretive leeway. I suspect you'll enjoy either
the Collard or the Stott in that regard.
This music seems to get better with each hearing.
|
| Show full article (0.95Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|