|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: WhisperWhisper Date: Nov 19, 2006 02:11
> This one looks better...
>
> Beatles dominate this again.... 51 songs!!! Led Zeppelin has 38 songs.
> Thats very good because they didn't even make 1/3rd of the amount of
> the songs Beatles made. AFAIK, Led Zeppelin made only 85 songs and 38
> of them are on this list! Pink Floyd get 18, Yes get 6
>
> These guys gave an excel file... I sorted the list. see the unsorted
> list on this website.
> http://www.thedigitallife.net/top1000.htm
>
Police need to be ranked higher, & where the fuck is 'So Lonely'...?
Not in top 1,000? Get fucked.
|
| |
|
| | 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: Dave HazelwoodDave Hazelwood Date: Nov 19, 2006 03:47
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:11:41 +1100, Whisper ozemail.com.au>
wrote:
>> This one looks better...
>>
>> Beatles dominate this again.... 51 songs!!! Led Zeppelin has 38 songs.
>> Thats very good because they didn't even make 1/3rd of the amount of
>> the songs Beatles made. AFAIK, Led Zeppelin made only 85 songs and 38
>> of them are on this list! Pink Floyd get 18, Yes get 6
>>
>> These guys gave an excel file... I sorted the list. see the unsorted
>> list on this website.
>> http://www.thedigitallife.net/top1000.htm
>> >
>
>Police need to be ranked higher, & where the fuck is 'So Lonely'...?
>Not in top 1,000? Get fucked.
Where is :
|
| Show full article (0.74Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: zepfloyeszepfloyes Date: Nov 19, 2006 07:12
Whisper wrote:
>> This one looks better...
>>
>> Beatles dominate this again.... 51 songs!!! Led Zeppelin has 38 songs.
>> Thats very good because they didn't even make 1/3rd of the amount of
>> the songs Beatles made. AFAIK, Led Zeppelin made only 85 songs and 38
>> of them are on this list! Pink Floyd get 18, Yes get 6
>>
>> These guys gave an excel file... I sorted the list. see the unsorted
>> list on this website.
>> http://www.thedigitallife.net/top1000.htm
>> >
>
> Police need to be ranked higher, & where the fuck is 'So Lonely'...?
> Not in top 1,000? Get fucked.
|
| Show full article (0.95Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: CC RedfordCC Redford Date: Nov 19, 2006 11:41
WHAT??? Where are the Osmonds and the Partridge Family???? And not
having the Monkees there is a list travesty!!!!!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Sean CarrollSean Carroll Date: Nov 19, 2006 13:51
slunk wrote:
> Rocky Raccoon at 150 ?
You know, I've been trying to figure out for years now whether Rocky
Raccoon is actually supposed to be a *raccoon*, or if that's just his
last name.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Caffe MochaCaffe Mocha Date: Nov 21, 2006 07:52
> More analysis through excel reveal this
>
> Bands/Artists with 5 or more songs
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Beatles 51
> Led Zeppelin 38
> Rolling Stones 36
This doesn't matter to anybody but you.
Please keep your Excel masturbation to yourself. The rest of us don't
need lists to justify the music we like. I know, you have to prove to
the world that your music is the bestest because it's the most
innovativest and stuff. People in the real world don't have these
neuroses. You must be a hoot at your new job there. If your co-workers
can't stand you, here's a clue -- it's you, not them.
Maybe this will help, too:
http://www.ocfoundation.org/what-is-ocd.html
Medication is your friend. So is contact with the opposite sex. Try it.
Just don't make a list about it.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ZepFloYesZepFloYes Date: Nov 21, 2006 08:12
Caffe Mocha wrote:
>> More analysis through excel reveal this
>>
>> Bands/Artists with 5 or more songs
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> Beatles 51
>> Led Zeppelin 38
>> Rolling Stones 36
>
> The rest of us don't
> need lists to justify the music we like.
LOL ... most of my favorite bands do not have a single song on that
list. You, once again prove that you are a total idiot.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: JeffJeff Date: Nov 21, 2006 16:08
TimBliz wrote:
> "John Doe" wrote in message
> news:Xns9880C74FBE5C40123456789@207.115.17.102...
>> "TimBliz" sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>> Where is Fat Bottom Girls by The Beatles?
>>
>> Actually by Queen.
>>
>>> Surely it shoud have made the top 20!
>>> I LOVE that song!!! It's the best Beatles song.
>>> Isn't it on Technical Ecstacy?
>>
>> Actually by Black Sabbath.
>>
> Oh Really?
> Well not according to ZepFloYes' top 500.
> Fat Bottom Girls by The Beatles is the 394th Greatest Song Of All Time!
It's about time we started talking about these new Beatles songs.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: JeffJeff Date: Nov 21, 2006 16:13
Caffe Mocha wrote:
>> More analysis through excel reveal this
>>
>> Bands/Artists with 5 or more songs
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> Beatles 51
>> Led Zeppelin 38
>> Rolling Stones 36
>
> This doesn't matter to anybody but you.
|
| Show full article (1.10Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: JeffJeff Date: Nov 21, 2006 16:15
ZepFloYes wrote:
> Caffe Mocha wrote:
>>> More analysis through excel reveal this
>>>
>>> Bands/Artists with 5 or more songs
>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>> Beatles 51
>>> Led Zeppelin 38
>>> Rolling Stones 36
>>
>> The rest of us don't
>> need lists to justify the music we like.
>
> LOL ... most of my favorite bands do not have a single song on that
> list. You, once again prove that you are a total idiot.
Someone isn't a idiot for what music they enjoy.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
