|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: barbarabarbara Date: Jun 21, 2008 08:11
I'm crossposting this to ARK and rec.music.artists.reb-st-james, a
newsgroup that seems to have had no on-topic posts for a couple of
years, aside from a single post last October announcing a Web site
devoted to Rebecca St. James, whoever she may be.
P'raps by being crossposted there, ARK posts may still be seen by the
forlorn who are losing access to alt.*.
The problem with sci.chemistry is that it appears to be a rogue Big 8
group, so news providers such as mine won't have it. What is needed
is a legit Big 8 group that isn't being used. So I went looking for
rec. and soc. groups that might not be in use and found this rec.music
one.
BW
|
| |
|
| | 13 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Dr. HotSaltDr. HotSalt Date: Jun 21, 2008 13:17
> I'm crossposting this to ARK and rec.music.artists.reb-st-james, a
> newsgroup that seems to have had no on-topic posts for a couple of
> years, aside from a single post last October announcing a Web site
> devoted to Rebecca St. James, whoever she may be.
>
> P'raps by being crossposted there, ARK posts may still be seen by the
> forlorn who are losing access to alt.*.
>
> The problem with sci.chemistry is that it appears to be a rogue Big 8
> group, so news providers such as mine won't have it. What is needed
> is a legit Big 8 group that isn't being used. So I went looking for
> rec. and soc. groups that might not be in use and found this rec.music
> one.
M'kay. Lesse if I got this straight- some bigtime ISPs are gonna
drop the alt. hierarchy because SOME of it MIGHT contain kiddy pr0n
rather than just blocking the relevant groups (or even co-operating
with Law Enforcement to Do Something about the perps).
SO wegotta go looking for an alt to alt?
|
| Show full article (1.49Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: barbarabarbara Date: Jun 21, 2008 14:25
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:17:01 -0700 (PDT), "Dr. HotSalt"
gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm crossposting this to ARK and rec.music.artists.reb-st-james, a
>> newsgroup that seems to have had no on-topic posts for a couple of
>> years, aside...
|
| Show full article (3.14Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: TimCTimC Date: Jun 21, 2008 17:21
On 2008-06-21, Dr. HotSalt (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
> SO wegotta go looking for an alt to alt?
>
> OTOH Google Groups, which is a Go Ogle Product (tm) (r) (etc) who
> calim they "do no evil" are NOT dropping teh alt. hierarchy.
>
> Well, I'll just keep using my free Go Ogle groups subscription
> thingy which is great except it doesn't do BINARIES GROUPS (hint
> HINT!) which means no PICTURE-ORIENTED GROUPS (HINT!! HINT!!).
But won't anybody thing of the ascii art child porn?
--
TimC
Information wants to be beer, or something like that. --unknown
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: DoctroidDoctroid Date: Jun 24, 2008 09:20
> It would probably be more practical for those thus affected to look
> into cheap or free alternatives. I don't know whether there still are
> any free non-Web-based Usenet alternatives, but several people here
> have mentioned relatively cheap alternatives.
Earlier this year teranews was still around, and still free; I would
assume it still is and is now, but I'm not using it.
individual.net is not free but it's liek $10 a year or something, and
it's what I'm using.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Matthew L. MartinMatthew L. Martin Date: Jun 24, 2008 15:58
Doctroid wrote:
>> It would probably be more practical for those thus affected to look
>> into cheap or free alternatives. I don't know whether there still are
>> any free non-Web-based Usenet alternatives, but several people here
>> have mentioned relatively cheap alternatives.
>
> Earlier this year teranews was still around, and still free; I would
> assume it still is and is now, but I'm not using it.
Let me check ... Yuppers. Teranews is still there and still free.
> individual.net is not free but it's liek $10 a year or something, and
> it's what I'm using.
I'll keep that in mind if I have to go to below-the-horizon. I'm
currently using chartered-in-hell, but that could change without notice.
Matthew
|
| Show full article (0.95Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Michael KuettnerMichael Kuettner Date: Jun 25, 2008 09:35
bookpro.com> schrieb :
> Glenn was apparently experimenting with using another group. I didn't
> think he meant that all of ARK should move there en masse and abandon
> ARK. Another alternative would be to crosspost between an unused Big
> 8 group and ARK. I suspect that it's not really practical to do that.
> I doubt I would remember it every time, and there's the problem of
> people whose newsreaders *don't* automatically crosspost replies. I
> don't know whether Google Groups does crossposting at all.
>
> It would probably be more practical for those thus affected to look
> into cheap or free alternatives. I don't know whether there still are
> any free non-Web-based Usenet alternatives, but several people here
> have mentioned relatively cheap alternatives.
>
|
| Show full article (1.00Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: ShellyShelly Date: Jun 26, 2008 07:51
Michael Kuettner wrote:
I think you may have been the person who pointed me toward
Motzarella sometime last yearish. Anyway, I've been using it since
then, and while it does have periodic (brief!) down-time, it's a
perfectly good (and free!) option. I would (and have) recommend(ed) it.
So, um, I second what Mr. Kuettner wrote.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: DoctroidDoctroid Date: Jun 26, 2008 08:36
In article registered.motzarella.org>,
Shelly cat-sidh.net> wrote:
> Michael Kuettner wrote:
>
>
> I think you may have been the person who pointed me toward
> Motzarella sometime last yearish. Anyway, I've been using it since
> then, and while it does have periodic (brief!) down-time, it's a
> perfectly good (and free!) option. I would (and have) recommend(ed) it.
>
> So, um, I second what Mr. Kuettner wrote.
I figured I'd take a look at it so tried signing up. It told me my
email domain (which resembles r1chh0lmes.net, but isn't) is invalid.
PLONK.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Mark FergersonMark Fergerson Date: Jun 26, 2008 11:19
Michael Kuettner wrote:
> bookpro.com> schrieb :
>
>> Glenn was apparently experimenting with using another group. I didn't
>> think he meant that all of ARK should move there en masse and abandon
>> ARK. Another alternative would be to crosspost between an unused Big
>> 8 group and ARK. I suspect that it's not really practical to do that.
>> I doubt I would remember it every time, and there's the problem of
>> people whose newsreaders *don't* automatically crosspost replies. I
>> don't know whether Google Groups does crossposting at all.
>>
>> It would probably be more practical for those thus affected to look
>> into cheap or free alternatives. I don't know whether there still are
>> any free non-Web-based Usenet alternatives, but several people here
>> have mentioned relatively cheap alternatives.
>>
|
| Show full article (1.22Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|