Steve Linford: In response yo your claim below: You're really getting desperate when you quote a lawsuit against SPEWS to try and prove a ... that dumb? Unless, of course, you are formerly admitting, for legal puposes, that Spamhaus and SPEWS are the same group... Steve Linford wrote: In article <pan.2006.10.06.18.20.44.361532@remove.this.part.rtij.nl>, Martijn Lievaart <m@...

On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 12:22:16 +0200, Steve Linford wrote: Actually we de-listed Bolen back in July, he's not been on the SBL since. We've had no reason to list his IP again as IFAIK he has not spammed since. Bolen isn't angry about being on our list, since he's not on it, he's angry that we will put him back on it if he spams again. I ...

NetworkElf@localhost.localdomain wrote: On 2006-10-06, Steve Linford <linford@spamhaus.org> wrote: Also somewhere in there Turner refers to me as being a resident of Idaho. Presumably that was "Idaho, United Kingdom". Or Paris, Idaho. US 8th graders tend to get their geography mixed up. I love British taters! Ore-Ida® Tater Tots® -- Boise, Idaho :-)

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 20:38:14 +0200, Steve Linford <linford@spamhaus.org> wrote: If you would bother to check the many news reports and... filed the following lawsuit against the entities listed on page 2, which included Spamhaus and Steve Linford, and demanded the sum of $3 Million (3 x $1M) in para 14 of page 4: Gets so confusing all these pointless attempts to ...

On 2006-10-06, Steve Linford <linford@spamhaus.org> wrote: Also somewhere in there Turner refers to me as being a resident of Idaho. Presumably that was "Idaho, United Kingdom". I love British taters!

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 20:47:05 +0200, Steve Linford wrote: You should be more carefull in how you goad the trolls. It confuses others that are not in the know about what happened back then. Heh, I agree, and the link to the actual case so you can see what it was about and what judgement was demanded by the spammer is here: http://www....

... the following lawsuit against the entities listed on page 2, which included Spamhaus and Steve Linford, and demanded the sum of $3 ... (3 x $1M) in para 14 of page 4: http://www.spamhaus.org/archive/legal/... restraining order (which we ignored) is on page 6. Turner again refers to the sum of $3M in para 13 of page 12. Also somewhere in there Turner refers to ...

...> following lawsuit against the entities listed on page 2, which included Spamhaus and Steve Linford, and demanded the sum of $3 ... (3 x $1M) in para 14 of page 4: http://www.spamhaus.org/archive/legal/... restraining order (which we ignored) is on page 6. Turner again refers to the sum of $3M in para 13 of page 12. Also somewhere in there Turner refers to...

... the following lawsuit against the entities listed on page 2, which included Spamhaus and Steve Linford, and demanded the sum of $3 Million (3 x $1M) in para 14 of page 4: http://www.spamhaus.org/archive/legal/... restraining order (which we ignored) is on page 6. Turner again refers to the sum of $3M in para 13 of page 12. Also somewhere in there Turner refers to ...

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:28:10 +0200, Steve Linford wrote: In article <pan.2006.10.05.17.55.41.601717@remove.this.part.rtij.nl>, Martijn Lievaart <m@remove.this.part.... and to have got, a judgement for $2M (some recall it was $3M) although the following pages do not mention amounts: Ah, I get it. There was a claim for a judgement by someone. ...