Le Creuset - Dee's new purchase
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
rec.food.equipment only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

rec.food.equipment Profile…
 Up
Le Creuset - Dee's new purchase         


Author: Dee Dee
Date: Aug 8, 2008 10:33

Never (never say never) thought I'd purchase another Le Creuset pan/
pot because of previous luck, but here I am again; price was good
enough to try it. Ordered online.

I just received this pan, here are some pics. What do you think? Is
it a return? Or a keeper?

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=34zlfdi&s=4

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=iqvpde&s=4

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=32zv154&s=4

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=116mcr4&s=4

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2ntai6f&s=4
shows inside on pot.

Dee Dee
9 Comments
Re: Le Creuset - Dee's new purchase         


Author: pltrgyst
Date: Aug 8, 2008 12:22

On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:33:43 -0700 (PDT), Dee Dee shentel.net> wrote:
>Never (never say never) thought I'd purchase another Le Creuset pan/
>pot because of previous luck, but here I am again; price was good
>enough to try it. Ordered online.
>
>I just received this pan, here are some pics. What do you think? Is
>it a return? Or a keeper?

It's fully functional, IMO. No health hazards to worry about. I've seen very
large Le Creusets with chips larger than that sell of eBay for only $20 or so
less than perfect, new items.

Return, if you paid anywhere near normal retail for it. If you got a really good
buy, then only you can evaluate that tradeoff
-- unless you want to tell us the
size and what you paid. 8;).

-- Larry
no comments
Re: Le Creuset - Dee's new purchase         


Author: Dee Dee
Date: Aug 8, 2008 14:02

On Aug 8, 3:22 pm, pltrgyst spamlessxhost.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:33:43 -0700 (PDT), Dee Dee shentel.net> wrote:
>>Never (never say never) thought I'd purchase another Le Creuset pan/
>>pot because of previous luck, but here I am again;  price was good
>>enough to try it.  Ordered online.
>
>>I just received this pan, here are some pics.  What do you think?  Is
>>it a return? Or a keeper?
>
> It's fully functional, IMO. No health hazards to worry about. I've seen very
> large Le Creusets with chips larger than that sell of eBay for only $20 or so
> less than perfect, new items.
>
> Return, if you paid anywhere near normal retail for it. If you got a really good
> buy, then only you can evaluate that tradeoff -- unless you want to tell us the
> size and what...
Show full article (1.62Kb)
no comments
Re: Le Creuset - Dee's new purchase         


Author: pltrgyst
Date: Aug 8, 2008 14:45

On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:02:32 -0700 (PDT), Dee Dee shentel.net> wrote:
>Here it is:
>http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=e9bvj4&s=4
>
>I paid $79.99 including S&H from Costco online. Since I ordered it
>last weekend, it is out-of-stock, so it is not shown.
>No lid comes with it. The price was right for me to try it, but I
>don't think it was a 'big bargain.'
>
>
>Rhyme:
>It is 12 inches across and 2-1/2 inches high, and
>It caught my eye.
>
>What will I use it for? Well, that remains to be seen :-))
>
Perfect risotto pan! If you don't want it, I'll offer you the $80 plus shipping
to Alexandria. 8;)
Show full article (0.78Kb)
no comments
Re: Le Creuset - Dee's new purchase         


Author: Dee Dee
Date: Aug 8, 2008 15:11

On Aug 8, 5:45 pm, pltrgyst spamlessxhost.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:02:32 -0700 (PDT), Dee Dee shentel.net> wrote:
>
>>I paid $79.99 including S&H from Costco online.  Since I ordered it
>>last weekend, it is out-of-stock, so it is not shown.
>>No lid comes with it.   The price was right for me to try it, but I
>>don't think it was a 'big bargain.'
>
>>Rhyme:
>>It is 12 inches across and 2-1/2 inches high, and
>>It caught my eye.
>
>>What will I use it for?  Well, that remains to be seen :-))
>
> Perfect risotto pan! If you don't want it, I'll offer you the $80 plus shipping
> to Alexandria.  8;)
>
> I would think that for the $80, you could get a perfect 5 to 6 quart Batali or ...
Show full article (1.30Kb)
no comments
Re: Le Creuset - Dee's new purchase         


Author: Will
Date: Aug 8, 2008 17:31

On Aug 8, 12:33 pm, Dee Dee shentel.net> wrote:
> Never (never say never) thought I'd purchase another Le Creuset pan/
> pot because of previous luck, but here I am again; price was good
> enough to try it. Ordered online.
>
> I just received this pan, here are some pics. What do you think? Is
> it a return? Or a keeper?
>
> http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=34zlfdi&s=4
>
> http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=iqvpde&s=4
>
> http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=32zv154&s=4
>
> http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=116mcr4&s=4
>
> http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2ntai6f&s=4
> shows inside on pot.
>
> Dee Dee ...
Show full article (0.75Kb)
no comments
Re: Le Creuset - Dee's new purchase         


Author: Dee Dee
Date: Aug 8, 2008 19:34

On Aug 8, 8:31 pm, Will gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 8, 12:33 pm, Dee Dee shentel.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> Never (never say never) thought I'd purchase another Le Creuset pan/
>> pot because of previous luck, but here I am again;  price was good
>> enough to try it.  Ordered online.
>
>> I just received this pan, here are some pics.  What do you think?  Is
>> it a return? Or a keeper?
>
>
>
> ...
Show full article (1.14Kb)
no comments
Re: Le Creuset - Dee's new purchase         


Author: Wayne Boatwright
Date: Aug 9, 2008 18:28

On Fri 08 Aug 2008 10:33:43a, Dee Dee told us...
Show full article (1.08Kb)
no comments
Re: Le Creuset - Dee's new purchase         


Author: Dee Dee
Date: Aug 9, 2008 20:49

On Aug 9, 9:28 pm, Wayne Boatwright cox.net> wrote:
> On Fri 08 Aug 2008 10:33:43a, Dee Dee told us...
>
>
>
>
>
>> Never (never say never) thought I'd purchase another Le Creuset pan/
>> pot because of previous luck, but here I am again;  price was good
>> enough to try it.  Ordered online.
>
>> I just received this pan, here are some pics.  What do you think?  Is
>> it a return? Or a keeper?
>
>
>
> ...
Show full article (2.86Kb)
no comments
Re: Le Creuset - Dee's new purchase         


Author: Wayne Boatwright
Date: Aug 10, 2008 20:06

On Sat 09 Aug 2008 08:49:44p, Dee Dee told us...
> On Aug 9, 9:28
no comments