> While intrepidly exploring the bowels of USENET on Tuesday, August 12,
> 2008, Stevep...@gmail.com rolled initiative and posted the following:
>

>> On Aug 12, 7:20 am, klu...@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

>

>>> I take it you have never lived next to a big coal-fired generator plant?
>>> --scott

>

>> Do I need to? Ever hear of Youtube or tv? Fact is coal is awful, but
>> times that by at least 1000 and this is how bad all the accumulated
>> auto exhaust is. Furthermore, who lives near coal plants? <1%%. Who
>> lives in and around cities? > 90%%. Weak argument. Sorry to see you
>> lose that one bigtime.

>
> Actually, one does not have to live near a coal plan to be affected.

> Of course it's your own post. You're being given credit for starting
> the thread. Go back and read what Dominic wrote.

>>> And while it is true that your original question was about bottled
>>> water, the discussion quickly moved to tap water. And you, yourself,
>>> later commented in the thread about the harmful stuff present in your
>>> tap water.

>

>> and?

>
> And, in response to Dominic's reference (including group name) you
> said "No such thread exists for discussing tap water".

> On Aug 12, 5:33 pm, Derek wrote:

>> While intrepidly exploring the bowels of USENET on Tuesday, August 12,

>

>>>> Evaporation produces H20 in the air. It's still water. It doesn't
>>>> produce nitrogen or free-standing oxygen, which make up the majority
>>>> of our air.

>>

>>> So what does it produce? Dirt? What does steam produce? Dirt?
>>> Funny how you never answer this.

>>
>> Water vapor from evaporation later condenses in the high atmosphere
>> and comes back down as precipitation.

>
> "Later" what about "sooner" and "in between time"? Air. You breathe
> some amount of evaporated water every day and with every breath. Why
> do you continue to duck this fact?

> On Aug 12, 5:41 pm, Derek wrote:

>> While intrepidly exploring the bowels of USENET on Tuesday, August 12,
>> 2008, Stevep...@gmail.com rolled initiative and posted the following:
>>...

> On Aug 12, 6:57 pm, Derek wrote:
>

>> Of course it's your own post. You're being given credit for starting
>> the thread. Go back and read what Dominic wrote.

>
> No, I meant no "TAP WATER VS BOTTLED WATER" NG exists. That's been my
> contention all along. Furthermore, why would anyone half sane provide
> a source which is my own ??

>I argue that vaporization of water is insufficient for the creation of "air."

> On Aug 12, 7:39 pm, Derek wrote:
>

>>I argue that vaporization of water is insufficient for the creation of "air."

>
> Now it's insufficient?! So now you agree that I'm partly right. Pretty
> soon you'll be in full agreement with my first view lol.

>>>>>> Evaporation produces H20 in the air. It's still water. It doesn't
>>>>>> produce nitrogen or free-standing oxygen, which make up the majority
>>>>>> of our air.

>>

>>>>> So what does it produce...

> No, I don't read further down.

>Yes, I did that experiment. The water vapor fills the balloon, as well
>as causing the existing air to warm and expand. If you let it cool
>down, ALL of the water vapor will condense back into a liquid.

> On Aug 12, 8:11 pm, Derek wrote:

>>Yes, I did that experiment. The water vapor fills the balloon, as well
>>as causing the existing air to warm and expand. If you let it cool
>>down, ALL of the water vapor will condense back into a liquid.

>
> Wrong again squirt. You've obviously never did the experiment or lie
> because the balloon in the gaseous state is less than 5%% water.

> You like being wrong a lot huh. Sorry to disappoint you, but I'm
> getting tired of proving you wrong.