|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: SNSN Date: Jul 27, 2007 09:07
i just tried posting with a prefix in the subject
[TEA] subject
but google groups did not show it as such!, just subject...
|
| |
|
| | 20 Comments |
|
  |
Author: SNSN Date: Jul 27, 2007 09:08
trying (TEA)
On Jul 27, 12:07 pm, SN gmail.com> wrote:
> i just tried posting with a prefix in the subject
>
> [TEA] subject
>
> but google groups did not show it as such!, just subject...
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: SNSN Date: Jul 27, 2007 09:33
seems (TEA) works
if you guys want to chime in as to usefulness of posting with a
prefixed subject
-may be better visible between spams
-unknowing posters may not know
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Lewis PerinLewis Perin Date: Jul 27, 2007 11:08
SN gmail.com> writes:
> i just tried posting with a prefix in the subject
>
> [TEA] subject
>
> but google groups did not show it as such!, just subject...
If you're trying out things like this, why not use alt.test?
/Lew
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Alan PetrilloAlan Petrillo Date: Aug 2, 2007 02:32
Lewis Perin wrote:
> SN gmail.com> writes:
>
>> i just tried posting with a prefix in the subject
>>
>> [TEA] subject
>>
>> but google groups did not show it as such!, just subject...
>
> If you're trying out things like this, why not use alt.test?
Better yet, use a real news reader and news service.
AP
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: SNSN Date: Aug 2, 2007 08:34
On Aug 2, 5:32 am, Alan Petrillo baylink.com> wrote:
> Lewis Perin wrote:
>> SN gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> i just tried posting with a prefix in the subject
>
>>> [TEA] subject
>
>>> but google groups did not show it as such!, just subject...
>
>> If you're trying out things like this, why not use alt.test?
>
> Better yet, use a real news reader and news service.
>
> AP
i dont think so
since google read+writes to usenet, how is that NOT a real news reader
or service?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Dominic T.Dominic T. Date: Aug 2, 2007 09:46
On Aug 2, 11:34 am, SN gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 2, 5:32 am, Alan Petrillo baylink.com> wrote:
>
>> Lewis Perin wrote:
>>> SN gmail.com> writes:
>
>>>> i just tried posting with a prefix in the subject
>
>>>> [TEA] subject
>
>>>> but google groups did not show it as such!, just subject...
>
>>> If you're trying out things like this, why not use alt.test?
>
>> Better yet, use a real news reader and news service.
>
>> AP
>
> i dont think so
> since google read+writes to usenet, how is that NOT a real news reader ...
|
| Show full article (1.86Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: SNSN Date: Aug 2, 2007 10:08
well, technically it is a 'real' news reader and server, yes, web
based, dumbed down, simplified.
since it manages to do the job of uuencoding, uudecoding, posting,
processing messages using the usenet nntp protocols, messages
propagate to other news servers, therefore it is able to communicate
using the required standards.
more than 10 years ago there was almost no newsgroup spam, so when
they didnt have enough filtering back then it means they were not
real ?
google groups may not be how some people like it but it doesnt mean
its not 'real'.
what you're trying to say by a 'real' server is a PAID newsservice
provider
and as you pay more, you get more (usually).
i dont know a newsreader software that has these 'thousands' of
features and options,
more like a dozen features.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Dominic T.Dominic T. Date: Aug 2, 2007 17:52
On Aug 2, 1:08 pm, SN gmail.com> wrote:
> well, technically it is a 'real' news reader and server, yes, web
> based, dumbed down, simplified.
> since it manages to do the job of uuencoding, uudecoding, posting,
> processing messages using the usenet nntp protocols, messages
> propagate to other news servers, therefore it is able to communicate
> using the required standards.
>
> more than 10 years ago there was almost no newsgroup spam, so when
> they didnt have enough filtering back then it means they were not
> real ?
>
> google groups may not be how some people like it but it doesnt mean
> its not 'real'.
>
> what you're trying to say by a 'real' server is a PAID newsservice
> provider
> and as you pay more, you get more (usually).
>
> i dont know a newsreader software that has these 'thousands' of ...
|
| Show full article (1.54Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: SNSN Date: Aug 2, 2007 18:37
i will save my bullshit, store it in a ziploc, and promise to take my
meds next time!
but would you like to show me where this "bullshit" is at?
google reads&posts messages that propagate to all of usenet?
doesnt do files so it doesnt need the uuenc/yenc etc, ok with that. my
bad
paid server (NH)... most of the spam as here in google groups
isp server... most of the spam as well
would you like me to compare the list of messages for an exact
comparison?
free readers,
i can count (when im on the meds) but i dont see thousands of features
maybe you have the real reader with thousands of features,
but since you did not port it to windows i am not able to find/use
it!
i guess because you cant use news.google.com:119 you are very upset!
your reply is highly brutal and inane as well,
please drink some green tea and relax.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|