rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
rec.collecting.stamps.discuss only
 
Advanced search
May 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
   1234 18
567891011 19
12131415161718 20
19202122232425 21
262728293031  22
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
rec.collecting.stamps.discuss Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Re: Which countries have no CTO?         


Author: rodney
Date: May 4, 2008 00:27

"Joshua McGee"
> I think that's a fair distinction, upon reflection. I'd go with "Favor-
> cancelled block, no postal duty served." It's probably the second clause
> that gets your hackles up?

Yes that sounds fine, (and truthful).
the hackles remain supine.

It's what the stamps broadcast to the viewer,
that has me perplexed.
Here I am, a mint block of 4, cancelled and for what reason?
do you really think I came off a parcel like that?

As a young lad, I never understood the cross comb
of balding men, or the ill fitting toupe.
Did they not understand we all knew immediately?
What's so terrible about being bald?
7 Comments