|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Blair (TC)Blair (TC)
Date: Dec 31, 2006 21:39
Ton van Reenen wrote:
> Rod,
>
> Fort du Bus was indeed on what was later called Dutch New Guinea near what
> is now called Kaimana. It was named after the governor-general of the
> Netherlands Indies, L.P.J. Du Bus de Ghisignies. Has been used between 1828
> and 1836. In Wikipedia you can find more info, but the article is in Dutch
>
> Ton
|
| Show full article (2.24Kb) |
|
| |
2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Jay T. CarriganJay T. Carrigan
Date: Dec 31, 2006 19:05
From the search engine on the American Philatelic Research Library
web site < http://www.stamps.org/TheLibrary/lib_ArticleIndex.htm>:
MONTENEGRO:
Edwin Mueller "Montenegro: The Establishment of the Postal Service and The
First Issue of Postage Stamps" Collectors Club Philatelist 1950 Sep 29 #5
I also found this one (may be the same article but probably in German):
Montenegro Mueller, E. "Establishment of postal service and first issue of
stamps" Berner Briefmarken-Zeitung 1951 Nov
I also find that I have an extra copy of Mercury Stamp Journal no. 60,
which I would be willing to sell. Contact me privately if interested.
Jay Carrigan change domain to mchsi
< www.jaypex.com>
|
| Show full article (1.10Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Victor MantaVictor Manta
Date: Dec 31, 2006 16:55
> Victor
>
> I follow your argument re. food etc. However I disagree about freedom...
>snip for brevity
>
> If the state decides to put the post office in the free market economy
> - either it obliges the competition to operate to the same rules as I
> said - or it has to underwrite the additional costs in the areas in
> which said competition does not wish to participate
>
> Malcolm
|
| Show full article (2.15Kb) |
|
2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: malcolmmalcolm
Date: Dec 31, 2006 11:27
If the postmark is illegible then soaking will do no harm - apart from
the caveats already mentioned. However if the postmark is clear and
legible ( and the stamp common ) it may be better left on piece for the
sake of the postmark - especially if it is a duplicate of a stamp
already in your collection. Stamps from small post offices or with
distinctive markings are collected by a small number of devotees, and
by postal historians. A small selection of these may be exchanged with
such collectors for "normal" stamps for your collection.
I am quite happy to soak junior collections to obtain the odd new
specimen for my collection and to add to my collection of trading
duplicates. Not all will be rescued, but there is something satisfying...
|
| Show full article (3.82Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: RodRod
Date: Dec 30, 2006 20:13
> Some older stamps on pelure paper and so forth are a real chore. Some
> curl, you get gum breaks and a lot of other nasty stuff.
If you lay the damp stamp against the curl, on a
cotton tea towel, on a flat surface, and caress the
surface with the heel of your stamp tongs, it will correct curl
every time.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Luis EdwardsLuis Edwards
Date: Dec 30, 2006 17:53
Over a several millions men have been helped with the potent ingredients
in Pen-is Growth Patch - men have experienced bigger size, deeper penetration
more action, and super-satisfying results for themselves and
their partners.
Don't be left behind! Take advantage of price specials going on now.
Click here and visit our site!
http://www.bipemc.com/
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: SmithSmith
Date: Dec 30, 2006 17:03
That wraps it up nicely Tracy.
Being new and having limited knowledge, it is with some trepidation
that I take any of these precious works of art and put them in water to
soak and could not fathom why one would do so. It appears
counter-intuitive; however, now I can make an informed decision.
Thank you to everyone for input. Its been an enjoyable read and I
certainly have many ways to go about soaking if and when I get up the
nerve - I am surprised no one mentioned the shot of scotch!
Cheers,
Susan
Tracy_Barber@frontiernet.net wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:08:43 -0000, "David French"
> nospam_lineone.net> wrote:
>
>>Why is everyone assuming that the stamps are being removed from 'Covers'...
|
| Show full article (3.75Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: RodRod
Date: Dec 30, 2006 16:46
A good deal of amusement was created in Sydney
in the early part of the month by collectors seeking to
obtain postage due stamps by posting overweight letters
to each other. Evidently the Post-office people were
determined not to join in the scheme, for no end of
heavy letters were posted with only a penny stamp
on before one was mulcted. However, when the postmen
did start, several collectors had to pay more than they
bargained for in the shape of old china, doorkeys, and
other bric-a-brac, at the rate of fourpence per ounce.
Acknowledgement:
"Vindin's Philatelic Monthly"
January 1891
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: RodRod
Date: Dec 30, 2006 16:33
Thanks Ton, thanks Gerhard,
the mud is a little clearer now :)
and found Kaimana.
My interest stemmed from reading about a remarkable cover
sent from Armagh Ireland to Papua in 1885.
Irish jokes aside, it is most curious as to why a letter
was sent to Fort DuBus 45 years after it had closed !!
due to Malaria and hostile natives.
The cover ended up as a "dead letter" in Queensland Australia,
after travelling from Ireland, to India, to Port Moresby,
to Thursday Island, and thence to Australia.
"Gerhard Reichert" wrote in message
news:45964f02$0$30325$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net...
>
> "Rod" iprimus.com.au> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:4596459b_1@news...
|
| Show full article (2.39Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: chrischris
Date: Dec 30, 2006 15:55
My grandfather's 1933 stamp album by Thorp & Martin shows a 1929 issue
of the 11 cent Rutherford B. Hayes in a "light yellow green" color. It
is perforated 11 by 11 and appears identical to the 1922-25 "light
blue" issue (Scott number 563) except for the color.
I can't find a place for it in my Mystic album and I can't find a
Scott number for it.
Is this just a minor shading variation, not considered a seperate
variety anymore? Or is there a Scott number for it?
Chris
|
| |
|
2 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|