|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Short Wave SportfishingShort Wave Sportfishing Date: Jan 2, 2008 05:00
Here's what I'm thinking just based on reading things here and there.
Democrats favor Obama, then Edwards, then Clinton, then everybody
else.
I'm thinking Obama gets out with a lead of three or four points over
Edwards in second and Clinton a very close third to Edwards - say
within a point or two. Everybody else, Dodd, Biden, Krazyinich will
all slide to less than 4%% of the vote in total.
Republicans - I'm thnking Romney with an insigificant lead over
Huckabee and Thompson a strong third. Ron Paultard will show a
surprising 13%% of the vote from all the Paulbots that show up from
other states.
Now I need to call my bookie. :>)
|
| |
|
| | 393 Comments |
|
|
Author: DownTimeDownTime Date: Jan 2, 2008 05:41
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
> Here's what I'm thinking just based on reading things here and there.
>
> Democrats favor Obama, then Edwards, then Clinton, then everybody
> else.
>
> I'm thinking Obama gets out with a lead of three or four points over
> Edwards in second and Clinton a very close third to Edwards - say
> within a point or two. Everybody else, Dodd, Biden, Krazyinich will
> all slide to less than 4%% of the vote in total.
>
> Republicans - I'm thnking Romney with an insigificant lead over
> Huckabee and Thompson a strong third. Ron Paultard will show a
> surprising 13%% of the vote from all the Paulbots that show up from
> other states.
>
> Now I need to call my bookie. :>)
Your bookie is taking action on the primaries? That is sad. I'm assuming
even the bookies are also it hard by the current real estate slump.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: justwaitafrekinminutejustwaitafrekinminute Date: Jan 2, 2008 05:47
On Jan 2, 8:41Â am, DownTime comcast.net> wrote:> Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
>> Here's what I'm thinking just based on reading things here and there.
>
>> Democrats favor Obama, then Edwards, then Clinton, then everybody
>> else.
>
>> I'm thinking Obama gets out with a lead of three or four points over
>> Edwards in second and Clinton a very close third to Edwards - say
>> within a point or two. Â Everybody else, Dodd, Biden, Krazyinich will
>> all slide to less than 4%% of the vote in total.
>
>> Republicans - I'm thnking Romney with an insigificant lead over
>> Huckabee and Thompson a strong third. Â Ron Paultard will show a
>> surprising 13%% of the vote from all the Paulbots that show up from
>> other states.
>
>> Now I need to call my bookie. Â :>)
>
> Your bookie is taking action on the primaries? That is sad. I'm assuming ...
|
| Show full article (1.10Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: JoeSpareBedroomJoeSpareBedroom Date: Jan 2, 2008 05:56
"Short Wave Sportfishing" swsports.org> wrote in message
news:v82nn3dnv66gafh0uvkn4ufv2i3j620gq9@4ax.com...> Here's what I'm thinking just based on reading things here and there.
>
> Democrats favor Obama, then Edwards, then Clinton, then everybody
> else.
>
> I'm thinking Obama gets out with a lead of three or four points over
> Edwards in second and Clinton a very close third to Edwards - say
> within a point or two. Everybody else, Dodd, Biden, Krazyinich will
> all slide to less than 4%% of the vote in total.
>
> Republicans - I'm thnking Romney with an insigificant lead over
> Huckabee and Thompson a strong third. Ron Paultard will show a
> surprising 13%% of the vote from all the Paulbots that show up from
> other states.
>
> Now I need to call my bookie. :>)
Meanwhile, McCain's the only Republican candidate with a spine.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: HKHK Date: Jan 2, 2008 06:09
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> "Short Wave Sportfishing" swsports.org> wrote in message
> news:v82nn3dnv66gafh0uvkn4ufv2i3j620gq9@4ax.com...>> Here's what I'm thinking just based on reading things here and there.
>>
>> Democrats favor Obama, then Edwards, then Clinton, then everybody
>> else.
>>
>> I'm thinking Obama gets out with a lead of three or four points over
>> Edwards in second and Clinton a very close third to Edwards - say
>> within a point or two. Everybody else, Dodd, Biden, Krazyinich will
>> all slide to less than 4%% of the vote in total.
>>
>> Republicans - I'm thnking Romney with an insigificant lead over
>> Huckabee and Thompson a strong third. Ron Paultard will show a
>> surprising 13%% of the vote from all the Paulbots that show up from
>> other states.
>>
>> Now I need to call my bookie. :>)
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.09Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: BARBAR Date: Jan 2, 2008 06:12
HK wrote:
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>> "Short Wave Sportfishing" swsports.org> wrote in message
>> news:v82nn3dnv66gafh0uvkn4ufv2i3j620gq9@4ax.com...>>> Here's what I'm thinking just based on reading things here and there.
>>>
>>> Democrats favor Obama, then Edwards, then Clinton, then everybody
>>> else.
>>>
>>> I'm thinking Obama gets out with a lead of three or four points over
>>> Edwards in second and Clinton a very close third to Edwards - say
>>> within a point or two. Everybody else, Dodd, Biden, Krazyinich will
>>> all slide to less than 4%% of the vote in total.
>>>
>>> Republicans - I'm thnking Romney with an insigificant lead over
>>> Huckabee and Thompson a strong third. Ron Paultard will show a
>>> surprising 13%% of the vote from all the Paulbots that show up from
>>> other states.
>>>
>>> Now I need to call my bookie. :>) ...
|
| Show full article (1.35Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: HKHK Date: Jan 2, 2008 06:16
BAR wrote:
> HK wrote:
>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>> "Short Wave Sportfishing" swsports.org> wrote in message
>>> news:v82nn3dnv66gafh0uvkn4ufv2i3j620gq9@4ax.com...>>>> Here's what I'm thinking just based on reading things here and there.
>>>>
>>>> Democrats favor Obama, then Edwards, then Clinton, then everybody
>>>> else.
>>>>
>>>> I'm thinking Obama gets out with a lead of three or four points over
>>>> Edwards in second and Clinton a very close third to Edwards - say
>>>> within a point or two. Everybody else, Dodd, Biden, Krazyinich will
>>>> all slide to less than 4%% of the vote in total.
>>>>
>>>> Republicans - I'm thnking Romney with an insigificant lead over
>>>> Huckabee and Thompson a strong third. Ron Paultard will show a
>>>> surprising 13%% of the vote from all the Paulbots that show up from
>>>> other states.
>>>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.51Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BARBAR Date: Jan 2, 2008 06:20
HK wrote:
> BAR wrote:
>> HK wrote:
>>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>>> "Short Wave Sportfishing" swsports.org> wrote in message
>>>> news:v82nn3dnv66gafh0uvkn4ufv2i3j620gq9@4ax.com...>>>>> Here's what I'm thinking just based on reading things here and there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Democrats favor Obama, then Edwards, then Clinton, then everybody
>>>>> else.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm thinking Obama gets out with a lead of three or four points over
>>>>> Edwards in second and Clinton a very close third to Edwards - say
>>>>> within a point or two. Everybody else, Dodd, Biden, Krazyinich will
>>>>> all slide to less than 4%% of the vote in total.
>>>>>
>>>>> Republicans - I'm thnking Romney with an insigificant lead over
>>>>> Huckabee and Thompson a strong third. Ron Paultard will show a
>>>>> surprising 13%% of the vote from all the Paulbots that show up from
>>>>> other states. ...
|
| Show full article (1.58Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: HKHK Date: Jan 2, 2008 06:27
BAR wrote:
> HK wrote:
>> BAR wrote:
>>> HK wrote:
>>>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>>>> "Short Wave Sportfishing" swsports.org> wrote in message
>>>>> news:v82nn3dnv66gafh0uvkn4ufv2i3j620gq9@4ax.com...>>>>>> Here's what I'm thinking just based on reading things here and there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Democrats favor Obama, then Edwards, then Clinton, then everybody
>>>>>> else.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm thinking Obama gets out with a lead of three or four points over
>>>>>> Edwards in second and Clinton a very close third to Edwards - say
>>>>>> within a point or two. Everybody else, Dodd, Biden, Krazyinich will
>>>>>> all slide to less than 4%% of the vote in total.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Republicans - I'm thnking Romney with an insigificant lead over
>>>>>> Huckabee and Thompson a strong third. Ron Paultard will show a
>>>>>> surprising 13%% of the vote from all the Paulbots that show up from ...
|
| Show full article (1.75Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: thunderthunder Date: Jan 2, 2008 06:38
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 05:47:17 -0800, justwaitafrekinminute wrote:
> So, what is the difference between a slump and a logical correction?
> Does it depend on who is in the Whitehouse??
Perhaps, if Republicans hadn't gutted the Glass-Steagall Act we wouldn't
have had this sub-prime fiasco. But you are right, Clinton did sign the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
