rec.aviation.piloting
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
rec.aviation.piloting only
 
Advanced search
January 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
 123456 1
78910111213 2
14151617181920 3
21222324252627 4
28293031    5
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
rec.aviation.piloting Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Thinking of your next holiday         


Author: magicalnepal
Date: Jan 23, 2008 23:15

Are you planning for vacation, holiday?
We would like you to spare your valuable time!
Visit our website www.magical-nepal.com for information on Nepal,
Tibet and Bhutan.

Thanking you in advance visiting and look forward to assist you.

Regards,

Rath Nepal Tours and Travels
P O Box 10691, 2nd Floor Mountain Plaza
Tel: 977-1-4268948, 4258141, 4264512
Fax: 977-1-4264512
E-mail: sales@magical-nepal.com
website: www.magical-nepal.com
no comments
  Two good reads         


Author: John Smith
Date: Jan 23, 2008 17:41

In the past week I have received two of my February aviation
periodicals, FLYING and AOPA PILOT.
I found one article in each of the magazines to be of interest in
relation to discussing the topic of personal aviation safety.

FLYING, February 2008, page 41, Jay Hopkin's TRAINING column. The title
is WHAT IS SAFETY?

AOPA PILOT, February 2008, page 101, LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE CRASH by
Steven B Zaboji.
no comments
  Naval Aviators         


Author: sockpuppet61
Date: Jan 23, 2008 17:13

I glanced in my copy of Hansen's "First Man, The Life of Neil A.
Armstrong" and happened on a passage about the background of the
Apollo pilots charged with landing the LMs on the Moon: six of the
seven chosen were naval aviators
(Armstrong,Conrad,Shepard,Young,Cernan). Only one was US Air Force
(Scott). Deke Slayton hand picked the guys -- and Slayton was Air
Force.

I wonder if there are enough training or experience differences to
have played a role, or if it was an individual talent / skill issue.

Any civilian pilots ever in the US space program?
15 Comments
  Wood Laminations and Springback         


Author: Kyle Boatright
Date: Jan 23, 2008 16:29

I'm working on the center section for a Hatz. The trailing edge of the
center section is a recurved lamination that provides better access to the
front cockpit.

I've steamed and clamped the strips into a form, and they have taken on some
of the curve, but when I unclamp 'em after they dry, I get significant
springback. The question is whether I need to allow for this in the
finished lamination, or whether the springback will go away when I glue up
the assembly?

FYI, the lamination starts as four 3" x 1/4" strips.

Thanks in advance,

Kyle Boatright
3 Comments
  Re: For the FAA lovers         


Author: Judah
Date: Jan 23, 2008 16:08

Slug aol.com> wrote in news:1%%8lj.42$4U1.29@newsfe05.lga:
Show full article (0.93Kb)
no comments
  FS: Max Trescott's Garmin G1000 CD-ROM Course VFR + IFR         


Author: Bri
Date: Jan 23, 2008 13:48

no comments
  Piston single research         


Author: B A R R Y
Date: Jan 23, 2008 09:04

Folks,

I'm starting to research my next plane.

Is anyone aware of a book that lists, or better yet, groups by
similarities, piston single aircraft for performance and specification
research?

Any suggestions are welcome. A website would be OK, too, but I'd
actually prefer printed material.

Thanks!
18 Comments
  CAP T182T Crash on Nov. 8         


Author: gwengler
Date: Jan 23, 2008 07:02

For whatever it's worth, I located the crash site from the coordinates
given in the NTSB preliminary. The North Town One Departure from KVGT
from where the airplane left calls for an overflight of the LAS VOR.
The crash site is only half a mile from the direct course from LAS to
L00, the airplane's destination. I know the did not file an IFR
flight plan, and I have no idea about the actual route of flight;
however, I found this an interesting coincidence.
Gerd
16 Comments
  PLANE DOES 360 AT 20000 FT!!!!         


Author: A&E SUPERSTAR
Date: Jan 23, 2008 00:30

Without warning or reports of turbulence, an Air Canada flight en route to
Toronto dipped and rotated violently, on early Thursday morning, causing
injuries and confusion among passengers and the crew. Strangely enough,
flight experts are still unsure about what caused the accident.

"What happened aboard Air Canada flight 190," said a reporter on CBC's The
National, "can best be described as chaos."

According to passenger accounts, the Airbus aircraft bucked and rolled side
to side abruptly, hurling dishes and people through the air. "It was
weird," one passenger told the CBC. "The plane actually turned upside down
without actually feeling it. There were people on the roof. Coffe and shit
[was] flying all over the plane."

After steadying the plane, the pilots were able to make an emergency
landing in Calgary under their own power. Ten of the 88 people aboard were
injured, even though the episode was over in 15 seconds. All have since
been released from the hospital.

So what caused the jolt? Immediately following the event, the pilot
announced that the plane's autopilot program had been knocked out. But
others aren't convinced.
Show full article (1.83Kb)
14 Comments