|
|
Up |
|
  |
Author: TopazTopaz Date: May 9, 2011 18:14
On Sun, 8 May 2011 19:11:01 +0100, "Keith Willshaw"
demon.co.uk> wrote:
>Topaz wrote:
>> By Mark Weber
>>
>> Much has already been written about Roosevelt's campaign of deception
>> and outright lies in getting the United States to intervene in the
>> Second World War prior to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in
>> December 1941. Roosevelt's aid to Britain and the Soviet Union in
>> violation of American neutrality and international law,
>
>There was nothing illegal about supplying Britain and Russia
>with seapons for their own defence.
It's war.
|
| Show full article (12.08Kb) |
|
| | 13 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Keith WillshawKeith Willshaw Date: May 9, 2011 19:18
Topaz wrote:
> On Sun, 8 May 2011 19:11:01 +0100, "Keith Willshaw"
> demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Topaz wrote:
>>> By Mark Weber
>>>
>>> Much has already been written about Roosevelt's campaign of
>>> deception and outright lies in getting the United States to
>>> intervene in the Second World War prior to the Japanese attack on
>>> Pearl Harbor in December 1941. Roosevelt's aid to Britain and the
>>> Soviet Union in violation of American neutrality and international
>>> law,
>>
>> There was nothing illegal about supplying Britain and Russia
>> with seapons for their own defence.
>
> It's war.
>
|
| Show full article (5.21Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: TopazTopaz Date: May 10, 2011 03:00
On Mon, 9 May 2011 18:18:58 +0100, "Keith Willshaw"
demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>> There was nothing illegal about supplying Britain and Russia
>>> with seapons for their own defence.
>>
>> It's war.
>>
>
>And how does that make a difference precisely ?
The USA wanted war, not Germany.
|
| Show full article (8.82Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: DanDan Date: May 10, 2011 04:35
On 5/9/2011 8:00 PM, Topaz wrote:
> On Mon, 9 May 2011 18:18:58 +0100, "Keith Willshaw"
> demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>> There was nothing illegal about supplying Britain and Russia
>>>>>>> with seapons for their own defence.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's war.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>And how does that make a difference precisely ?
> The USA wanted war, not Germany.
>
Odd way to avoid war, the Nazis declared war on the U.S. 11 December
1941. The U.S. then declared war on Germany.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Keith WillshawKeith Willshaw Date: May 10, 2011 09:32
Topaz wrote:
> On Mon, 9 May 2011 18:18:58 +0100, "Keith Willshaw"
> demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>>> There was nothing illegal about supplying Britain and Russia
>>>> with seapons for their own defence.
>>>
>>> It's war.
>>>
>>
>> And how does that make a difference precisely ?
>
> The USA wanted war, not Germany.
>
For a country that didnt war Germany did a lot of invading.
Czechoslovalia, Poland, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, Greece etc
|
| Show full article (2.53Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: TopazTopaz Date: May 10, 2011 13:06
On Mon, 09 May 2011 21:35:36 -0500, Dan AOL.COM> wrote:
>> The USA wanted war, not Germany.
>>
>
> Odd way to avoid war, the Nazis declared war on the U.S. 11 December
>1941. The U.S. then declared war on Germany.
>
By Mark Weber
|
| Show full article (54.92Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: TopazTopaz Date: May 10, 2011 13:10
"Czechoslovakia provided Soviet Russia with landing fields for
aircraft, thereby increasing the threat against Germany." -- Adolf
Hitler
Here is part of Hitler's speech on April 1, 1939 in Wilhelmshaven:
"They say we have no right to do this or that. I should like to raise
the counter-question: What right, for example, has England to shoot...
|
| Show full article (5.01Kb) |
| 4 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Keith WillshawKeith Willshaw Date: May 10, 2011 20:12
Topaz wrote:
> "Czechoslovakia provided Soviet Russia with landing fields for
> aircraft, thereby increasing the threat against Germany." -- Adolf
> Hitler
>
A big fat lie. When he said this Germany and the USSR were already
negotiating the deal under which they would carve up eastern
europe. Its no coincedence that Stalin was making similar claims
about Germany and the Baltic States.
> Here is part of Hitler's speech on April 1, 1939 in Wilhelmshaven:
> "They say we have no right to do this or that. I should like to raise
> the counter-question: What right, for example, has England to shoot
> down Arabs in Palestine just because they defend their homeland; who
> gives them this right?
> Anyway, we have not slaughtered thousands in Central Europe but
> instead we have regulated our problems with law and order.
The law of the gun, whip and shackle
|
| Show full article (1.78Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: TopazTopaz Date: May 11, 2011 12:24
On Tue, 10 May 2011 19:12:08 +0100, "Keith Willshaw"
demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>A big fat lie. When he said this Germany and the USSR were already
>negotiating the deal under which they would carve up eastern
>europe. Its no coincedence that Stalin was making similar claims
>about Germany and the Baltic States.
Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
"the problem of how the future of the German nation can be secured is
the problem of how Marxism can be exterminated."
"The largest so-called bourgeois mass meetings were accustomed to
dissolve, and those in attendance would run away like rabbits when
frightened by a dog as soon as a dozen communists appeared on the
scene."
|
| Show full article (2.83Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: RevdRevd Date: May 11, 2011 12:29
In article <8qoks6dorcf1a75lf87jcd2qpolpivssd7@ 4ax.com>,
Topaz hotmail.com> wrote:
> Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
"I promise you, the German people: in ten years, you
will not recognize your cities!"
-- Adolf Shitler, 1935.
And boy, was he right! :)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|