rec.aviation.military.naval
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
rec.aviation.military.naval only
 
Advanced search
December 2006
motuwethfrsasuw
    123 48
45678910 49
11121314151617 50
18192021222324 51
25262728293031 52
2006
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
rec.aviation.military.naval Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Re: Tomcat in Air and Space Museum         


Author: John Carrier
Date: Dec 14, 2006 19:14

> Except when the fookin radar didn't work, it didn't matter how good it
> was on paper. In the 12 months I flew the F-16, I launched w/o a radar
> exactly ZERO times, in about 450 hrs...I had a radar fail once in that
> time. It was standard to launch off the boat(VF-31, USS Forrestal) w/o
> a stinkin radar about 30 days into the cruise. I saw better radar
> availability with the F-4S(Awg-10) than I EVER did with the
> AWG-9...APG-71 had MUCH better availability than the HAWG-9....The
> inspired by the A-6, designed in the late 60s, F-14, never to be
> modified in the 2 decades it existed, was an embarrassment when
> compared to aircraft like the F-16C and F-15C/E....even the 'D'
> model...too little too late. If the F-14A became the 'C' model like it
> was supposed to, along the lines of...
Show full article (1.37Kb)
no comments
  Re: Tomcat in Air and Space Museum         


Author: peter
Date: Dec 14, 2006 16:48

Harry Andreas wrote:
> In article <1166104547.682773.236460@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>,
> peter@vecchios.com wrote:
>
>>>> I was flying them with the crappy flight controls, crappy engines,
>>>> crappy CADC...etc...
>>>> I flew the F-14A+ in VX-4..nice engines, crappy avionics. I saw the
>>>> F-14D...was in the planning for the cockpit...and it sucked compared to
>>>> the analog F-16N I flew...
>>>
>>> unless you need to fire a missile...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Harry Andreas
>>> Engineering raconteur
>>
>> ???Don't know what you mean? F-16N had all the plumbing for
>> Aim-9...even tho they were training aides only...just like the first
>> gen F-16....
> ...
Show full article (1.84Kb)
no comments
  Re: HUD view of a near-miss         


Author: John Weiss
Date: Dec 14, 2006 15:19

"Frank Stutzman" skylane.kjsl.com> wrote...
>
> A friend of mine flew A-6s in several Red Flag exercises. He has several
> such near
> miss stories. I think the best was when he was running along at about
> 500' agl
> when he had a F-16 (F-15?) overtake him from below and then immediately
> pull up in
> an immelmann turn in front of him.
>
> During the de-briefing, the other pilot was asked about this maneuver and
> why he
> did it. Basically, he was focused on what he was doing and never saw the
> A-6,
> before, during, or after his turn.

Fat chance! It sounds like a well-known "maneuver" known as "thumping"!

Also, I don't think I've ever seen anyone fly lower in exercises like that
than the Brits flying Buccaneers for the Oman AF (mid 80s). They would
regularly fly under our A-6s that were ingressing at 200' or less...
no comments
  Re: HUD view of a near-miss         


Author: Ron Wanttaja
Date: Dec 14, 2006 06:55

On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:08:07 -0500, Roger my.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:11:15 -0500, "Darkwing"
>>yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:9olfh.2090$eb5.536@newsreading01.news.tds.net...
>>> Here's a very close call as recorded through the HUD camera of a T-38C.
>>> Scott Wilson
>>> http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=qLVtstYAZLY
>>> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLVtstYAZLY>
>>
>>
>>That was about as close as it gets without aluminum scraps flying.

Back in the '80s, the Navy aviation safety magazine APPROACH had an article
about a Tempo Pinto trainer on final that struck a Cessna 150. The nosegear of
the jet basically ran over the wing root of the 150. Both planes landed safely.
the Cessna had a huge dent in the wing, the Pinto had a scuff on the nosewheel
tire. In other words, this was an actual collision between two metal airplanes
without aluminum scraps flying....

Ron Wanttaja
4 Comments
  Re: Tomcat in Air and Space Museum         


Author: peter
Date: Dec 14, 2006 05:55

Harry Andreas wrote:
> In article <1165975938.392067.289060@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com>,
> peter@vecchios.com wrote:
>
>> Gordon wrote:
>>> peter@vecchios.com wrote:
>>>> DDAY wrote:
>>>>> I was out at the Stephen F. Udvar-Hazy annex of the National Air
> and Space
>>>>> Museum today (near Dulles airport) and saw their newest acquisition: an
>>>>> F-14D Tomcat. This is one of the remanufactured F-14As, and it is
> one that
>>>>> shot down a MiG in 1989.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oddly, it does not have a MiG silhouette painted on it. Any idea why?
>>>>>
>>>>> Anybody have a list of the preserved Tomcats? I saw one up in
> Kalamazoo a
>>>>> few weeks ago.
>>>>> ...
Show full article (1.94Kb)
no comments