| Re: Mosely isn't going anywhere. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: rec.autos.sport.f1 · Group Profile
Author: GrantGrant Date: May 9, 2008 15:55
"Frank Adam" notthis.optushome.com.au> wrote in message
news:r9j924piomnkeqrkc5s9nj9kv2rhgtm8gs@4ax.com...> On Fri, 09 May 2008 15:04:47 -0700, Joseph eliminatespam.com>
> wrote:
>>>> They will not vote him off on June 3rd (FIA officials don't have any
>>> balls). And he will not retire in 2009 (just like he said he was
>>> stepping down before and decided to stay).
>>>
>>> We're stuck with Max and his stupid rules until he's about to die.
>>>
>>> I can only take so much of the boring parades. If F1 keeps its
>>> current form this will be my last year watching (started watching in
>>> 1992). The racing lacks any excitement. Which is right along the
>>> lines of what Max wants; He said that F1 should be like a game of
>>> Chess. Hello Stupid Max!! Chess isn't a spectator sport.
>>
>>And how are you supposed to increase the excitement?? I'm guessing that
>>you think you have the answer even though other commentators acknowledge
>>that there is not any way to do this without introducing other problems.
>>
> Only way is to cap the teams to 100 mills per year. Good luck doing
> and policing it.
>
>
Throw away the rule book on the cars, apart from a few and that sets the
overall dimensions of he car and safety, this would enable a variety of
engine types and fuels to be used. Its the stringent limitations currently
in place that has made the sport so boring, and limits innovation. Cost
should not be the governing factor for justifying such stringent rules. Yes
the richest teams will have the fastest car as they always have but atleast
clever innovations would give poorer teams a chance to use off the way
ideas.
| 
