|
|
 Up |
|
  |
Author: Ben BradleyBen Bradley
Date: Jun 8, 2010 03:59
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 16:07:48 -0400, "Soundhaspriority"
nowhere.com> wrote:
>I bought an SACD/CD dual-layer of an artist while attending a concert of the
>Philadelphia Orchestra. It's a "Hybrid Multichannel" disk, copyright 2009.
>
>So they're still pressing these things :)
Whatever happened to DVD-A? I recall a decade or more ago talk of
all the 24/96 and 24/192 audio formats available on DVD. Were there
any/many releases?
>Bob Morein
>(310) 237-6511
>
|
| |
|
| |
3 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Mike ClaytonMike Clayton
Date: Jun 8, 2010 02:02
Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article news.albasani.net>,
> Mike Clayton ext.canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:>> Scott Dorsey wrote:
>>
>>> AND Gotham also makes a siamese cable that has two star-quad mike
>>> cables joined together in something that looks like lamp cord on steroids.
>>> It is great for long connections to distant stereo pairs.
>> Scott, Do you have a part number for this cable?
>
> Hmm... I don't see it in their book. But they used to make, and may still
> do, a star-quad version of 12001.
> --scott
Looked on their web site and can see 12001 GAC-2pair flat Multipair
cable with flat construction. It's not star quad but will do fine for
me. Now to find a local supplier...
Mike
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Dirk Bruere at NeoPaxDirk Bruere at NeoPax
Date: Jun 7, 2010 22:47
On 07/06/2010 18:51, John Williamson wrote:
> Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
>> On 07/06/2010 15:58, Mark K wrote:
>>> On Jun 7, 10:32 am, "Soundhaspriority" nowhere.com> wrote:>>>> "Mike Rivers" d-and-d.com> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:huilcn$dtl$1@news.eternal-september.org...> Dirk Bruere at
>>>> NeoPax wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I don't know why anybody uses lossy formats in audio any
>>>>>> more. It's not as if 1TB HDDs are expensive.
>>>>
>>>>> Relatively, no. But until there's an iPod-sized 1 TB drive
>>>>> and we all have Internet download speeds 20 times what we
>>>>> have now, most people will continue to use compressed formats.
>>>>
>>>>> YOU are not MOST PEOPLE.
>>>>
>>>> Hearing damaged, most young people will not notice the difference.
>>>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.91Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Arny KruegerArny Krueger
Date: Jun 7, 2010 20:52
"Rick Ruskin" isomedia.com> wrote in message
news:rvaq0691l8eucd4ga98sg0ndg9736p7kov@4ax.com> I'm transferring some old 1/2" 16 track material to wav
> for a client. I'm saving all files as 24 bit rather than
> Audition's default 32 bit floating point because some
> programs can't deal with floating point.. 1 set of files
> crashes the program when I attempt to verify they are
> actually 24 rather than 32 bit. Any ideas as to what's
> going on and how to remedy it without having to
> re-transfer from analog?
I presume that you are working in multitrack mode.
If that's the case, just create a new 32 bit session, and add the files you
have already transferred into it. You lose your edits, but you don't have
to re-transfer from analog.
|
| |
|
7 Comments |
|
|
Author: polymodpolymod
Date: Jun 1, 2010 12:53
>
>
> This is a group for discussing music.
Unless your name is Brian.
Poly
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: 0junk4me0junk4me
Date: Jun 1, 2010 05:25
Mike Rivers writes:
>At this point, you don't have the capacity to learn what I
>have to tell you. At least your view of what's important
>shows that you have no clue as to how computer recording
>works. You really need more background in order to ask
>questions that have meaningful answers. Nobody can tell you
>which program or interface is better without knowing what
>you plan to do with it.
I see a lot of this around these days. SOme guy wants to
play in his home studio, doesn't know what he needs or how
to work with it, and comes to groups such as this one
seeking advice, but doesn't know what questions he should be
asking.
Mr. Man, we're not trying to insult you, believe me, but
you're talking to some folks here who've got years of
experience the predate computers and bedroom wanna be
rockers.
|
| Show full article (2.61Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Scott DorseyScott Dorsey
Date: Jun 1, 2010 04:12
The MAN gmail.com> wrote:>
> Although many mixer boards appear not to have individual
>line outs for each channel, but rather AUX sends. It would be nice
>to record each channel separately during a live gig.
If you don't have inserts or direct outputs on the console where you can
steal signal, you'll just have to bite the bullet and do it properly with
mike splitters.
You _are_ the guy from WebTV, aren't you?
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: The MANThe MAN
Date: Jun 1, 2010 04:08
On May 31, 6:01 pm, philicorda dontspamme.com> wrote:> On Mon, 31 May 2010 17:41:10 -0700, The MAN wrote:
>
>
>
>>> After 30 days, it shows a window for a few seconds when the program is
>>> started, asking you to purchase the software. Other than that, the
>>> program continues to work as before.
>
>> Really? Then it's more like a "donation" then a requirement
>> to
>> purchase.
>
> Effectively, yes.
>
> I think the software company understands that most people will never pay
> for it, but they don't see it as a donation payment. The license makes it
> very clear that you must pay for it after the evaluation period. I guess
> continuing to use it would be like using cracked software.
> ...
|
| Show full article (0.88Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: The MANThe MAN
Date: Jun 1, 2010 04:03
On May 31, 6:19 pm, Idiot Detector whoppo46.org> wrote:> On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:07:26 -0700 (PDT), The MAN wrote:
>> On May 31, 5:13 pm, Mike Rivers d-and-d.com> wrote:>>> The MAN wrote:
>>>> I certainly didn't learn anything from an idiot like you!
>
>>> At this point, you don't have the capacity to learn what I
>>> have to tell you. At least your view of what's important
>>> shows that you have no clue as to how computer recording
>>> works. You really need more background in order to ask
>>> questions that have meaningful answers. Nobody can tell you
>>> which program or interface is better without knowing what
>>> you plan to do with it.
>
>>> I suspect that in your case it makes no difference what you
>>> choose to work with now, so you might as well follow your
>>> gut feeling and go with the cheaper choice. It might be all
>>> you ever need. But then it might not do what you want to do
>>> right now.
> ...
|
| Show full article (2.07Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
