The Krooborg is wallowing in bliss after being humiliated by Mistress Jenn.
He's so elated that he sent out e-cards to all the other milquetoasts in his
club. Here's the picture he used to commemorate the splendiferous event:

http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg105/bvcj/internet-dominatrix.jpg

The sentiment, pure vintage Ludwig, from a most unlikely source:

http://www.thatsjewtastic.com/product.php?productid=79

That's Jewtastic Home Apparel

Sterilize the Stupid

Some people really should just not reproduce if you know what we mean.
Printed on 100%% American Apparel cotton.

Email this to friend!

1.

Don't know your size? Click Here
2.

You picked a popular product! Get it now while it’s in stock and
we’ll send it to you in about 2 business days.
If it’s not in stock just Request it and we’ll let you know when
it’s in stock and give you a discount!

Don't Forget... Free shipping on all orders over $36, and that's double
chai!

New!

There are 0 blogs for Sterilize the Stupid

Click here to be the first to post a blog for this product!

((Nope, the soft and fluffy Monroe and even better (for sheer fuckability
of appearance) Jayne Mansfield are just what real healthy male hands and
faces and tongues and peckers want. If we wanted hardbodies we'd pursue
linebackers. Bret.))

night. It's a nice ass, to be sure, but was rather disconcertingly wide.
Her whole body, in fact, seemed kind of puffy and pillowy, kind of slack
and loose. She was a beautiful, sexy woman, but I wonder if she could get
away with looking like that today.

Somewhere along the line, feminine softness gave way to the ideal of hard
bodies, toned and buff. You don't have to look very hard to see this. Just
pop in some old beach party movie and look at those girls-the soft tummies,
the puffy thighs (the unbelievably ugly bathing suits!) That's the way men
liked them back then, soft and spineless, a kind of Pillsbury Dough-Girl.

Don't Misunderestimate Obama

By Patrick J. Buchanan

and 82 percent saying the country is on the wrong track, the election of
2008 will turn on one issue: Barack Obama.

If Sen. Obama can convince the people he is "one of us," and not some
snooty radical liberal from Chicago's Hyde Park, who looks down upon white
America as a fever swamp of racism and reaction, a la the Rev. Jeremiah
Wright, the senator will be the next president.

The election of 2008 thus mirrors the election of 1980.

Then, the country wanted Jimmy Carter gone. Americans had had enough of 21
percent interest rates, 13 percent inflation and 7 percent unemployment.
They wanted the Iranian hostage crisis ended, violently if necessary.
After the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, America wanted a leader who
would not kiss Leonid Brezhnev on the cheek but reassert American power.

The issue then was Ronald Reagan. Portrayed as some Al Capp cartoon of a
crazed right-winger and B-Grade Hollywood actor given to spoutingReader's
Digest bromides, Reagan was regarded as ridiculous by much of the media
and too big a risk by much of the nation.

Memo From Mexico, By Allan Wall

More Latin Loudmouths—Mercosur Hypocritically Hectors EU On
Immigration.

criminalise irregular migration and the adoption of restrictive
immigration policies, in particular against the most vulnerable sectors of
society, women and children."

Furthermore, the declaration notes "the necessity to fight against racism,
discrimination, xenophobia and other forms of intolerance".

Typical rhetoric from Mexican politicians attacking U.S. immigration
policy? This time, it’s not.

In fact, the rhetoric doesn’t even come from Mexicans, but from other
Latin Americans. And it’s not even directed against the United States,
but against Europeans.

What’s going on here?

The declaration was concocted at the recent conclave of Mercosur, the
South American trade bloc. (Mercosur is a Spanish acronym for "Common
Market of the South". In Portuguese it’s Mercosul.)

Sounding black

Patterns and Racial Wage Inequality, by a U. of Chicago researcher who
collected audio samples recorded recently of 402 participants in the 1997
National Longitudinal Study of Youth cohort (The Bell Curve was based on
the earlier 1979 NLSY cohort). Jeffrey Grogger had five grad students
guess whether each interviewee was white or black.

Among whites, 82%% were said to be white by at least four of the five
listeners. Grogger calls these the "distinctly white" group. The other
18%%
were grouped as "indistinctly white." ("Indistinctly White" reminds me of
Onion Opinion essayist Amber Richardson, author of "Why Somebody Always
Around Everytime I Drop my Baby?")

Government

"Imagine buying cars the way we buy governments. Ten thousand people
would get together and agree to vote, each for the car he preferred.
Whichever car won, each of the ten thousand would have to buy it. It
would
not pay any of us to make any serious effort to find out which car is
best;
whatever I decide, my car is being picked for me by the other members of
the group. Under such institutions, the quality of cars would quickly
decline."

I respond:

What's the word for this?

I've argued that much about human behavior is reasonably predictable
(e.g., Beverly Hills schools will have higher test scores than Compton
schools for a long time to come), but that we are more interested in the
unpredictable.

For example, sports conferences are typically artificially structured to
make future champions unpredictable in the medium term. The pro team that
does worst this year typically gets the first draft pick of amateurs next
year. In the NFL, the schedule is gerrymandered to give this year's worst
teams the easiest row to hoe next season. This helps make the NFL more
interesting.

The longest article in my 1971 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica
appears to be the enormous entry on "World Wars" (lumping WWI and WWII
together as two acts of one sad story). So, you could plausibly argue that
the World Wars were (at least in the judgment of the editors of the E.B. in
1971) to be the most interesting thing in the entire universe.

A Work Force Betrayed

By Paul Craig Roberts

bought-and-paid-for US government, and a million dollar cap on executive
pay that is not performance related are permitting greedy and disloyal
corporate executives, Wall Street, and large retailers to dismantle the
ladders of upward mobility that made America an "opportunity society." In
the 21st century the US economy has been able to create net new jobs only
in nontradable domestic services, such as waitresses, bartenders,
government workers, hospital orderlies, and retail clerks. (Nontradable
services are "hands on" services that cannot be sold as exports, such as
haircuts, waiting a table, fixing a drink.)

Corporations can boost their bottom lines, shareholder returns, and
executive performance bonuses by arbitraging labor across national
boundaries. High value-added jobs in manufacturing and in tradable
services can be relocated from developed countries to developing countries
where wages and salaries are much lower. In the United States, the high
value-added jobs that remain are increasingly filled by lower paid
foreigners brought in on work visas.