|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: katekate
Date: Dec 15, 2007 13:17
KC wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:17:44 -0500, Pidge
> wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:19:14 -0500, KC earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>>On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:00:33 -0500, Dana Carpender
>>> nokivaspam.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>Child molester? Or is something else wrong, here?
>>>>
>>>>Dana
>>>
>>>I've been wondering when someone would want to discuss Sam. I was just
>>>listening from the next room, so I'll have to watch to comment on any
>>>molester suggestions, but at this point, I can't help but think the
>>>show is doing a huge disservice to Kurth. They got their hands on a ...
|
| Show full article (1.98Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: JasonJason
Date: Dec 15, 2007 13:12
I know it is just a soap, but it drives me crazy how Jack keeps saying how
Kit and Sam have criminal records and he doesn't want his kids around
criminals.
Criminal records or not, 90%% of Oakdale folks have committed serious
crimes, including Carly of course, but also wonderful Katie, brother Brad,
Parker's bro Will, Henry, Paul, Craig, Barbara, Lucinda, Dusty, Emily ...
Who can the kids be around then? Just Jack?
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: JasonJason
Date: Dec 15, 2007 10:52
Interesting how more and more I see foul language being implied through
abbreviations. I can't remember who, but someone on ATWT this week used BFD
as a response.
I've seen it on a couple of other shows recently as well. I think it was
Gossip Girl (yes, I am 30-something and watch GG) where someone said "Don't
F with an F-er."
I wonder when the censors will start allowing BS or FU?
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: record hunterrecord hunter
Date: Dec 15, 2007 09:17
On Dec 15, 11:36 am, ravelat...@ webtv.net (ravelation) wrote: >>> gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Yes. Very slimy. Doesn't surprise me>
>>>he's Q's type.
>
>>*You* think fish-lips is hot. Case closed!
>
> Ooooooh, two good burns. You guys are good at this!
>
> Ravl
> I think I've said that before...
We would all have been such fun in the same class in Catholic school
together. (For some reason, Catholic school brought out my baaaaaaad
side.)
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: ravelationravelation
Date: Dec 15, 2007 08:45
>But, now they're filling in his motivation.
>Friday's show, as he wept while Nikki
>played piano, was perfect. "I guess she
>doesn't know, Zapato. I'll have to tell
>her." Perfect! And then, seeing Nikki
>kiss David Chow, he leaves in a huff.
The first hint of this direction was when Victor read David's letter to
Nikki where he poured over her good qualities. The way he stuffed it in
his pocket and left in a rush told me he was taken aback and jealous
because another man had to tell her those things. It was as if that
letter reminded Victor of how wonderful Nikki really is. It was only
after he stewed the letter that he got really angry and kicked her out.
>You can see how a man like Victor,
>feeling rejected, would get like this.
Totally. He's not used to 2nd place.
Ravl
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: DivaDiva
Date: Dec 15, 2007 03:45
On Dec 14, 6:05 pm, "Ryka" shoes.com> wrote:>> On Dec 13, 9:00 pm, Patricia Wadley sbcglobal.net> wrote:>>> Shirl wrote:
>>>> "Willow" verizon.net> wrote:>
>>>>>I was thinking it might be nice if Victor brought back one of his old
>>>>>girlfriends to make Nikki jealous. Who was that Mexican doctor he had
>>>>>the
>>>>>affair with? Or maybe Lorie Brooks?
>
>>>> Oh, you mean ...
>>>> the ... person ... who ... speaks ... one ... word ... at ... a ...
>>>> time
>>>> ... and ... takes ... 10 ... minutes ... and ... 3 ... scenes ... to ...
|
| Show full article (1.48Kb) |
|
9 Comments |
|
|
Author: MarkHMarkH
Date: Dec 15, 2007 02:09
Grace Noble wrote:
>
> No doubt because they have so much in common - both Sharon and the baby
> prefer to be practically naked, will drool over anybody, and their attention
> spans can be distracted instantly by bright, shiny objects.
Funny!
But, this triggered in me something about a character with whom Sharon
professes to have nothing in common...spoiler:
|
| Show full article (0.84Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: MarkHMarkH
Date: Dec 15, 2007 02:06
Karen wrote:
>
> If this turns out to be the way it goes, Stephanie will need some
> compelling reason to protect Brooke so she can also keep Eric. Might
> Stephanie threaten Donna with revealing her beloved older sister,
> Brooke, as the real shooter if Donna doesn't stay away from Eric?
>
Oooh...that is soap opera perfection. I'd love to see that blackmail.
So, maybe what explains the ring in the video is that either Stephen
or Storm SAW Brooke do the shooting and noticed the camera, and they
quickly grabbed the gun to protect Brooke. That would be in character
with both men.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
