Schrödinger's Universe

One of the very best books, that has recently come out, is Dr. Milo
Wolff's brand new book: Schrödinger's Universe.

I've just now finished reading it and I predict that someday it will
be ranked in importance right up there next to Newton's Principia.

I agree with the premise set forth in this book that this is indeed a
scalar, standing wave, resonance universe.

Dr. Milo Wolff is correct: all electrons give and receive tiny bits
of
energy among each other and they do this basically (in all
directions)
in a scalar manner. Also Dr. Wolff correctly reiterates, constantly
throughout this book, that there is a definite reason for Mach's
principle and the electron is a scalar, standing wave, resonance that
has a spherical wave form.

This is exactly the type of resonance universe that Schrödinger
claimed we have.

There are some important "firsts" in Dr. Wolff's book as well.

Earn Min 5000$ p.m
Education Related Jobs
Work min 2hrs per day
http://businesmanages.googlepages.com

http://www.healthnews5.blogspot.com/

sexy girls fucking with hot guy

nude sex collections software

sex actress with nude photo gallary
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

http://www.funnywworld.com

http://www.funnywworld.com

http://www.funnywworld.com

http://www.funnywworld.com

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

welcome to visit www.jumpmanlocker.com.cn
air max 87 89 90 95 ltd timberland jeans ugg boots lacoste sandals
hoodies,
t-shirts, mauri shoes, dsquared , hogan shoes, dunks , red monkey,
polo t-shirts,
evisu jeans, bbc jeans , dior, lv, dg, versace, coach puma shoes, nfl
jerseys
shox r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 tn tl1 tl3, sandals, nhl jerseys, mlb jerseys,
nba
jerseys
probowl jerseys,prada shoes,kobe james, hockey jerseys, nfl jerseys,
football
jerseys, baseball jerseys, jordan shoes, jordan fusion air force ones
25 years
basketball jerseys Men's women's shocks OZ NZ TL shoes Discount
Coach
Sandals,
Dior Sandals, Prada Sandals, Chanel Sandals, Versace Sandals, Crocs
Sandals,
Women's Sandals Men's Slippers From China jordan shoes, jordan fusion ...

Sultan Residence to Holiday Cottage -
Home Manufacturing Worldwide

Munifus Landmark Estate â„¢ represents a building-contractor located in
many of the most beautiful and highly attractive locations around the
world. The following represents a detailed description for one...

Say on a starship someone put a gravity meter.

What could it tell the operator?

If we have a handwave emitter which can produce powerful beams of
gravitational waves, and those waves go on to interact with matter in
ordinary, strictly physical manner, what are the results?

Gravitational interaction is a weak one, so absorption as well as
other interactions (scattering, refraction) should be weak. But assume
that the ray is so strong that the effects are appreciable despite the
weakness of interaction.

Where should the effects appear?

In IR frequency range, gravitons ought to be absorbed at the same
frequencies as photons. But gravitons should have very different
selection rules (spin 2, no concern for electric dipole moments...).

In visible and near UV, the low mass of electrons compared to nuclei
should mean that gravitons should interact weakly with electron
orbitals.

How would visual pigments absorb gravitons?

In hard x-ray and gamma ray ranges, do gravitons undergo Compton
scattering? And can gravitons of suitable energy, or multigraviton
processes, cause nuclear reactions?

A question for the physicists out there.

I am working on creating a gravity drive that, I hope, while severely
bending the laws of physics, does not completely shatter them. The
purpose is to provide back story material and internal consistency, as
well as to provide me baselines to calculate energy requirements, etc.

Here's the theory of operation:

The drive creates a field of gravity at some point in front of a
spacecraft. The precise distance where the field can form is
determined by the drive mechanism and its susceptibility to tidal
forces (which tend to destabilize the generator; some technobabble
about feedback.)

Momentum is conserved via a gravity "wake", ripples in space-time with
a displacement equal to the forward momentum of the vessel. The energy
required to maintain the gravity field is equal to the gravitational
potential energy from the generator to the center of the field plus
the momentum of the wake/vessel. (For example, the gravitational wake
of a 100,000 kg vessel traveling at 10,000 m/s would be equal to the
gravity caused by a mass of 3kg)

Reading about the current state of the DAMA apparent detction of dark matter
[http://arxiv.org/pdf/0806.3989] I came across Foot's speculation that the
dark matter might be mirror matter (with its own subatomic particles,
atoms and photons, and planets and stars maybe, but only very weak
interactions with our matter--apart from gravitational attraction, which
is unchanged). In one of his papers [http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0407623v1]
he suggests that there would be bodies composed of both our matter and
mirror matter (his example in 2004 was possibly extrasolar "hot Jupiters").

Some questions: Presumably we understand our Sun (and Earth) well enough
to rule out significant proportions of mirror matter in them. But what if we
encountered a body that was ca. 50%% mirror matter? If it was a gas giant
or a star, I imagine the pressure-density relations would be significantly
different and might produce observable effects. (The star would be too
small and hot for its mass . . . or would it? I don't understand red
giants.) For a terrestrial planet of Earth's size and apparent
composition, the fact that it had twice the expected surface gravity would
be a clue. But would there be any simple way to tell? (Giving the planet
a sharp push and watching the oscillations after the two masses are
displaced apart probably doesn't count as "simple".)