> "Wim Jay" seeyou.jimmy.com> wrote in message
>
> news:a_-dnTRkl8fvZEzVnZ2dnUVZ8sLinZ2d@giganews.com...
>
>
>
>
>

>> "ah" gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:48d19da2$0$33687$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...

>>> honestj...@centurytel.net wrote:

>>>> "ah" gmail.com> wrote in message

>

>>>>> honestj...@centurytel.net wrote:

>

>>>>>> NAZIFAGGOT!

> ...

>
> "Naked Gonad" tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:48d2173f$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...

>> If the Bible says it's ok, then it's ....well....ok.....all agreed?
>>
>> Gonad

>
> No, not agreed. The Bible says many things are OK, if not compulsory:
>
> (from an old Usenet posting)
>
> a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a
> pleasing odour for the Lord (Lev. 1:9). The problem is my
> neighbours.They claim the odour is not pleasing to them. Should I
> smite them?

> Dennis M. Hammes wrote:

>> Her Illustrious Ashes wrote:

>>> myshitisfromgod wrote:

>>>>Dale Houstman wrote:

>

>>>> Depends on what you consider to be chains and what you consider to be
>>>> delight. "Free will" is mostly a pleasant - even necessary - illusion, just as
>>>> "gods" is mostly an unpleasant - even unnecessary - illusion. The
>>>> "openings" for actions that are not strongly determined by a Golden
>>>> Horde of existing factors (from natural laws to heredity to
>>>> education to
>>>> economics to the collective will to physical limitations to the
>>>> presence
>>>> of kryptonite in your bong water) are limited, although (according to
>>>> chaos and quantum theory) they exist in the virtuality of "things". If
>>>> "history" is a brand of collective natural determination (that is- if
>>>> you are considering "history" not as that vast pile of
>>>> power-determined
>>>> lies and myths but as whatever actuality lies behind all that celebrity ...