|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: gcarrasgcarras Date: Jul 8, 2007 20:38
(Becuase of the group-target limit I am pasting and sending this to
various related newsgroups, if anything it'll get it outta my systme
even if this flick is made and god---HITS!)
Where oh where, has our Underdog gone? Well,not to Disney that's for
sure, it's a whole new, dog, who is one step away from being a
nontalking pooch and only a regular dog as Underdog would be the
worst.
For the sake of the good patron saints and majordomos at Total
Teleivison Productions and Leonardo Productions, as well as TV Spots
vis-a-vis Creston Studios and Gamma Productions, living and dead,
including the soundtrack folks, this movie with Jason Lee must be
stopped.
This post is dedicated to (This covers for all of the "Total-TV"
series)
CREATORS AND PRODUCERS
Joe Harris
Buck Biggers
Treadwell Covington
C.A.Stover
|
| Show full article (1.31Kb) |
|
| | 67 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Doug JacobsDoug Jacobs Date: Jul 9, 2007 17:04
> (Becuase of the group-target limit I am pasting and sending this to
> various related newsgroups, if anything it'll get it outta my systme
> even if this flick is made and god---HITS!)
I saw a billboard for this down in LA last week. Big, huge billboard.
I thought I was seeing things until I looked again.
Apparently, yes, this is being made. No, it's not animated. No, not even
Underdog is animated (ala the Garfield movies). Yes, that's right. We've
got a live action dog. With a cape. Called Underdog.
God, a piece of my childhood just shrivled up and died right there.
--
It's not broken. It's...advanced.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Don Del GrandeDon Del Grande Date: Jul 9, 2007 18:00
Doug Jacobs wrote:
>> (Becuase of the group-target limit I am pasting and sending this to
>> various related newsgroups, if anything it'll get it outta my systme
>> even if this flick is made and god---HITS!)
>
>I saw a billboard for this down in LA last week. Big, huge billboard.
>
>I thought I was seeing things until I looked again.
>
>Apparently, yes, this is being made. No, it's not animated. No, not even
>Underdog is animated (ala the Garfield movies). Yes, that's right. We've
>got a live action dog. With a cape. Called Underdog.
>
>God, a piece of my childhood just shrivled up and died right there.
What's worse is, something tells me there are already plans for
Underdog 2. (Hands up, those of you who thought that the first
"George of the Jungle" movie would have put an end to any thoughts of
a sequel...)
|
| Show full article (0.91Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: RogerMRogerM Date: Jul 10, 2007 00:36
Doug Jacobs wrote:
>
> I saw a billboard for this down in LA last week. Big, huge billboard.
>
> I thought I was seeing things until I looked again.
>
> Apparently, yes, this is being made. No, it's not animated. No, not even
> Underdog is animated (ala the Garfield movies). Yes, that's right. We've
> got a live action dog. With a cape. Called Underdog.
>
> God, a piece of my childhood just shrivled up and died right there.
>
I just saw an ad for that monstrosity. It's sickening.
Why would they even pay for the 'Underdog' franchise, when it clearly
isn't? No one who cares about the cartoon will go to that piece of crap.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Doug JacobsDoug Jacobs Date: Jul 10, 2007 13:14
> Why would they even pay for the 'Underdog' franchise, when it clearly
> isn't? No one who cares about the cartoon will go to that piece of crap.
I think they're betting on the fact that no one remembers the cartoon, and
are hoping to appeal to the same audience that was responsible for
Hollywood making all those stupid Air Bud sequels.
--
It's not broken. It's...advanced.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: teemteem Date: Jul 10, 2007 19:23
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:14:50 -0000, Doug Jacobs
shell.rawbw.com> wrote:
>> Why would they even pay for the 'Underdog' franchise, when it clearly
>> isn't? No one who cares about the cartoon will go to that piece of crap.
>
>I think they're betting on the fact that no one remembers the cartoon, and
>are hoping to appeal to the same audience that was responsible for
>Hollywood making all those stupid Air Bud sequels.
And...All this crap about rights & ownership&estates,well,this must of
been a piece of cake to get.What will Simon Bar-Sinister look like.him
& Cad used to bust me up!!.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Invid FanInvid Fan Date: Jul 10, 2007 19:24
>> Why would they even pay for the 'Underdog' franchise, when it clearly
>> isn't? No one who cares about the cartoon will go to that piece of crap.
>
> I think they're betting on the fact that no one remembers the cartoon, and
> are hoping to appeal to the same audience that was responsible for
> Hollywood making all those stupid Air Bud sequels.
...although the tv commercial starts with a clip from the animated show.
--
Chris Mack "Refugee, total shit. That's how I've always seen us.
'Invid Fan' Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us."
-'Deal/No Deal', CHESS
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Anim8rFSKAnim8rFSK Date: Jul 12, 2007 00:30
In article 4ax.com>,
Don Del Grande earthlink.net> wrote:
> Doug Jacobs wrote:
>
>>> (Becuase of the group-target limit I am pasting and sending this to
>>> various related newsgroups, if...
|
| Show full article (1.26Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Doug JacobsDoug Jacobs Date: Jul 12, 2007 13:58
> ...although the tv commercial starts with a clip from the animated show.
Sure, why not. First, remind the audience of what the show used to be.
That way when the actual film is revealed, its soul crushing power will be
even more effective.
After all, if you'd hadn't heard of Underdog before, you'd just think this
was a bad Hollywood movie. But, having been educated (even briefly), you
can enjoy the true horror that this isn't just a bad movie...it's a
horrific remake/re-imagining of something that used to be considered
enjoyable...
*sigh*
As a special treat, I would be allowed to eat lunch at my little table and
chair set in the living room while watching Underdog on TV when I was 4
years old. Can't go back again :(
--
It's not broken. It's...advanced.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: RogerMRogerM Date: Jul 12, 2007 14:18
Doug Jacobs wrote:
>
> After all, if you'd hadn't heard of Underdog before, you'd just think this
> was a bad Hollywood movie. But, having been educated (even briefly), you
> can enjoy the true horror that this isn't just a bad movie...it's a
> horrific remake/re-imagining of something that used to be considered
> enjoyable...
>
> *sigh*
>
> As a special treat, I would be allowed to eat lunch at my little table and
> chair set in the living room while watching Underdog on TV when I was 4
> years old. Can't go back again :(
>
That's what puzzles me. People who care about Underdog are NOT going to
go to this film. Why even bother acquiring the rights?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|