Re: "Star Trek" teaser trailer--WWAD?
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
rec.arts.animation only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

rec.arts.animation Profile…
 Up
Re: "Star Trek" teaser trailer--WWAD?         


Author: Ken from Chicago
Date: Jan 23, 2008 05:02

"Ken from Chicago" comcast.net> wrote in message
news:kqydnbVeZoUbugranZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> "Ken from Chicago" comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:MPSdnTg2W-0vuQranZ2dnUVZ_tqtnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>> "Brian Thorn" suddenlink.net> wrote in message
>> news:cl2cp390hbv5ldktnimd1kkt82rase1brf@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:30:50 GMT, Chris Schumacher
>>> hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>You know Paramount, some people don't like to be teased. :p
>>>>Anybody else feel this way? I just wish they'd wait and give us a REAL
>>>>trailer instead of this shit.
>>> -==Kensu==-
>>>
>>> It's a teaser, not a trailer, that's what it is supposed to be. A
>>> trailer will have to wait for when they've actually finished filming
>>> the movie... at least, the principal photography. They're not even
>>> halfway through filming yet. ...
Show full article (2.48Kb)
1 Comment
Re: "Star Trek" teaser trailer--WWAD?         


Author: Derek Janssen
Date: Jan 23, 2008 05:16

Ken from Chicago wrote:
>>
>>Oddly enough is our resident professional animator's take on the teaser.
>>He practically lit up the usenet railing against the "remastered" STAR
>>TREK series

(Which looks pretty darn good on the HD digital broadcast channels, btw--
I'd watch it on disk, but HD-DVD is evil and deserved to die.) :)
>> but bupkiss on the STAR TREK teaser. This is so up his
>>balliwick given it's basically one long animatic. What's a professional
>>take on it? What strengths and weaknesses has he spotted that us mortals
>>overlooked? More to point, I guess the question is:
>>
>>What Would Anim Draw?
>>
> Then again, to be fair, Anim's not the only animator online. Maybe we should
> open up to topic in general. They have opinions on the Trek teaser:
>
> http://www.paramount.com/startrek/
Show full article (1.48Kb)
no comments