Re: [Star Trek:TAS][Review] "The Infinite Vulcan"
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
rec.arts.animation only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

rec.arts.animation Profile…
 Up
Re: [Star Trek:TAS][Review] "The Infinite Vulcan"         


Author: Jack Bohn
Date: Apr 11, 2007 06:38

Phillip Thorne wrote:
>The Infinite Vulcan
>By Walter Koenig
>Production 22002, Stardate 5554
>Aired 20 October 1973
><http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/ANI/episode/22002.html>

I, too am working from old memories of this, but what would
usenet be if I couldn't spout off half-formed and half-informed
thoughts?
>Plot comments:
>
>The Phyllosians speak of encountering humans before, which is why
>they're able to cure Sulu; presumably they mean Keniclius, although
>the connection is never made explicit. Keniclius, of course, did not
>bother telling Starfleet of his discovery.

Keniclius has no loyalty to (or knowledge of? see below)
Starfleet.
>The plague occurred when Agmar was "very young," an indeterminate time
>before.
Show full article (3.68Kb)
1 Comment
Re: [Star Trek:TAS][Review] "The Infinite Vulcan"         


Author: marika
Date: Apr 29, 2007 18:20

Jack Bohn wrote in message <3f5123thj50umrq4h1stgp6k21nr3s0f0q@4ax.com>...
>
>The background plates or cels against which the (somewhat)
>animated Swooper is moving. I'm going from ignorance, here, but
>I'm guessing they were mostly green, and that the animators
>didn't want the action element of the Swoopers to be lost among
>the greens, so they chose a contrasting color, one that wouldn't
>clash with green.

they dipped their brushes in the incline bottle

mk5000

"Dr. N. R. af Ursin founded an independent Finnish labor party, which
helped to provide the working classes with a voice in government.
Ursin was a socialist, but the party did not adopt socialism
immediately."--upinok
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Ta'c pha^?m "Vie^.t Kie^`u" cu?a ta'c gia? Nguye^~n Ngo.c Nga.nott.vietnamese ·
1984, tha^'t tra^.n ta.i Lao So+n CSVN pha?i ca('t 1000 km2 bie^n gio+'i cho Ta`uott.vietnamese ·
Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?sci.logic ·