| Re: South Park vs. Scientology, Round 3 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: rec.arts.animation · Group Profile
Author: ZinjZinj Date: Aug 4, 2006 11:48
>
> barbz wrote:
>> Interesting that you view that example as the apex. It's not, it's just
>> the tip of the iceberg. A flea infestation can kill a dog, if there are
>> enough of them.
>
> Well, it's what you brought up so that's all I have to work with. Even
> if that council viciously promotes Second Chance, so? Religious
> organizations are all the time doing things in their interest, take
> Alchoholics Anonymous for example. Or, shit! The Fundamentalist
> Christians! Every church has an interest in the State, especially if
> it's secular. Scientology simply doesn't seem very sinister to me, and
> regarding it as some hideous conspiracy hellbent on overthrowing the
> govenrment sounds ludicrous.
Not just the 'government'; the Boy Scouts; all other
'religions'; all health care; all police agencies, courts and
social agencies.
Everything.
That's the 'Clear Planet'.
If you don't know that, it's merely due to your own lack of
information, or, less charitably, your ignorance, deliberate,
feigned or merely unfortunate.
Nobody will force you to do the research necessary to support an
*informed* opinion, but until you have the information, what you
do or don't consider 'sinister' is pretty irrelevant.
As irrelevant as Hubbard's opinions on 'radiation', and, as
ignorant.
Zinj
--
You Can Lead a Clam to Reason; but You Can't Make Him Think
| 
