|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: apkiesapkies Date: Jun 9, 2008 02:26
So,what is everyone's verdict on it?
Andrew Kieswetter
apkies@ hotmail.com
|
| |
|
| | 7 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Anim8rFSKAnim8rFSK Date: Jun 10, 2008 13:26
In article
q27g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
apkies@hotmail.com wrote:
> So,what is everyone's verdict on it?
>
> Andrew Kieswetter
>
> apkies@ hotmail.com
It's Dreamworks. It sucks. SQUAWK!*
*With apologies to the Kenner bird. :)
--
Star Trek 09:
No Shat, No Show.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Derek JanssenDerek Janssen Date: Jun 10, 2008 13:35
Anim8rFSK wrote:
>
>>So,what is everyone's verdict on it?
>
> It's Dreamworks. It sucks. SQUAWK!*
> *With apologies to the Kenner bird. :)
We're PRETENDING to like it, just so the box-office reporters might
continue to beat up on the Adam Sandler movie, but that's as much grace
period as we'll give a lame Dreamworks squawker--
(Oh, and just to settle a bet, does "Funkytown" appear anywhere on the
soundtrack as its own gag?--I'm trying to make a list of how many
post-Shrek Dreamworks films *don't* use it in the script...)
Although hate to admit, the Weinsteins' "Igor" trailer doesn't...look
all that bad for a non-Pixar, although the Boxy Little Robot will still
triumph for the summer.
Derek Janssen (and nobody on the anime groups got it when I tried to
make a "Ranma 1/2 had a better kung-fu panda" joke, so I won't deign to
try it here, either.) :(
ejanss1@ verizon.net
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Antonio E. GonzalezAntonio E. Gonzalez Date: Jun 10, 2008 20:39
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:35:17 GMT, Derek Janssen
nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
>Anim8rFSK wrote:
>>
>>>So,what is everyone's verdict on it?
>>
>> It's Dreamworks. It sucks. SQUAWK!*
>> *With apologies to the Kenner bird. :)
>
>We're PRETENDING to like it, just so the box-office reporters might
>continue to beat up on the Adam Sandler movie, but that's as much grace
>period as we'll give a lame Dreamworks squawker--
>(Oh, and just to settle a bet, does "Funkytown" appear anywhere on the
>soundtrack as its own gag?--I'm trying to make a list of how many
>post-Shrek Dreamworks films *don't* use it in the script...)
>
|
| Show full article (1.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Anim8rFSKAnim8rFSK Date: Jun 12, 2008 10:19
In article <9AB3k.4048$1x.3190@trndny06>,
Derek Janssen nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
> Although hate to admit, the Weinsteins' "Igor" trailer doesn't...look
> all that bad for a non-Pixar, although the Boxy Little Robot will still
> triumph for the summer.
I hate the Johnny Five ads so much . . .
Have you gotten the one on IMDb, that appears OVER the page, and you
have to find the X and click the ad away before you can do anything,
because it covers the search box?
Way to convince me NOT to go to your movie, moronic Pixar ad execs.
--
Star Trek 09:
No Shat, No Show.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Derek JanssenDerek Janssen Date: Jun 12, 2008 11:07
Anim8rFSK wrote:
> In article <9AB3k.4048$1x.3190@trndny06>,
> Derek Janssen nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Although hate to admit, the Weinsteins' "Igor" trailer doesn't...look
>>all that bad for a non-Pixar, although the Boxy Little Robot will still
>>triumph for the summer.
>
> I hate the Johnny Five ads so much . . .
>
> Have you gotten the one on IMDb, that appears OVER the page, and you
> have to find the X and click the ad away before you can do anything,
> because it covers the search box?
> Way to convince me NOT to go to your movie, moronic Pixar ad execs.
Since IMDb does that for EVERY danged movie/TV event now, I've learned
not to misplace my anger, and focus on the guilty parties responsible...
|
| Show full article (0.98Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Date: Jun 12, 2008 20:25
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:19am-0700, Anim8rFSK cox.net>:
> In article <9AB3k.4048$1x.3190@trndny06>,
> Derek Janssen nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> Although hate to admit, the Weinsteins' "Igor" trailer doesn't...look
>> all that bad for a non-Pixar, although the Boxy Little Robot will still
>> triumph for the summer.
>
> I hate the Johnny Five ads so much . . .
>
> Have you gotten the one on IMDb, that appears OVER the page, and you
> have to find the X and click the ad away before you can do anything,
> because it covers the search box?
>
> Way to convince me NOT to go to your movie, moronic Pixar ad execs.
>
That's why I normally websurf with javascript off.
At least IMDB is stil usable with javascript off.
Laters. =)
|
| Show full article (1.26Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|