KUNG FU PANDA (Spoilers Welcome!)
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
rec.arts.animation only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

rec.arts.animation Profile…
 Up
KUNG FU PANDA (Spoilers Welcome!)         


Author: apkies
Date: Jun 9, 2008 02:26

So,what is everyone's verdict on it?

Andrew Kieswetter

apkies@hotmail.com
7 Comments
Re: KUNG FU PANDA (Spoilers Welcome!)         


Author: Anim8rFSK
Date: Jun 10, 2008 13:26

In article
q27g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
apkies@hotmail.com wrote:
> So,what is everyone's verdict on it?
>
> Andrew Kieswetter
>
> apkies@hotmail.com

It's Dreamworks. It sucks. SQUAWK!*

*With apologies to the Kenner bird. :)

--
Star Trek 09:

No Shat, No Show.
no comments
Re: KUNG FU PANDA (Spoilers Welcome!)         


Author: Derek Janssen
Date: Jun 10, 2008 13:35

Anim8rFSK wrote:
>
>>So,what is everyone's verdict on it?
>
> It's Dreamworks. It sucks. SQUAWK!*
> *With apologies to the Kenner bird. :)

We're PRETENDING to like it, just so the box-office reporters might
continue to beat up on the Adam Sandler movie, but that's as much grace
period as we'll give a lame Dreamworks squawker--
(Oh, and just to settle a bet, does "Funkytown" appear anywhere on the
soundtrack as its own gag?--I'm trying to make a list of how many
post-Shrek Dreamworks films *don't* use it in the script...)

Although hate to admit, the Weinsteins' "Igor" trailer doesn't...look
all that bad for a non-Pixar, although the Boxy Little Robot will still
triumph for the summer.

Derek Janssen (and nobody on the anime groups got it when I tried to
make a "Ranma 1/2 had a better kung-fu panda" joke, so I won't deign to
try it here, either.) :(
ejanss1@verizon.net
no comments
Re: KUNG FU PANDA (Spoilers Welcome!)         


Author: Antonio E. Gonzalez
Date: Jun 10, 2008 20:39

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:35:17 GMT, Derek Janssen
nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
>Anim8rFSK wrote:
>>
>>>So,what is everyone's verdict on it?
>>
>> It's Dreamworks. It sucks. SQUAWK!*
>> *With apologies to the Kenner bird. :)
>
>We're PRETENDING to like it, just so the box-office reporters might
>continue to beat up on the Adam Sandler movie, but that's as much grace
>period as we'll give a lame Dreamworks squawker--
>(Oh, and just to settle a bet, does "Funkytown" appear anywhere on the
>soundtrack as its own gag?--I'm trying to make a list of how many
>post-Shrek Dreamworks films *don't* use it in the script...)
>

Reality Check!:

<http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/kung_fu_panda/>

86%%, not bad . . . pretty damn good, actually!
Show full article (1.87Kb)
no comments
Re: KUNG FU PANDA (Spoilers Welcome!)         


Author: Anim8rFSK
Date: Jun 12, 2008 10:19

In article <9AB3k.4048$1x.3190@trndny06>,
Derek Janssen nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
> Although hate to admit, the Weinsteins' "Igor" trailer doesn't...look
> all that bad for a non-Pixar, although the Boxy Little Robot will still
> triumph for the summer.

I hate the Johnny Five ads so much . . .

Have you gotten the one on IMDb, that appears OVER the page, and you
have to find the X and click the ad away before you can do anything,
because it covers the search box?

Way to convince me NOT to go to your movie, moronic Pixar ad execs.

--
Star Trek 09:

No Shat, No Show.
no comments
Re: KUNG FU PANDA (Spoilers Welcome!)         


Author: Derek Janssen
Date: Jun 12, 2008 11:07

Anim8rFSK wrote:
> In article <9AB3k.4048$1x.3190@trndny06>,
> Derek Janssen nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Although hate to admit, the Weinsteins' "Igor" trailer doesn't...look
>>all that bad for a non-Pixar, although the Boxy Little Robot will still
>>triumph for the summer.
>
> I hate the Johnny Five ads so much . . .
>
> Have you gotten the one on IMDb, that appears OVER the page, and you
> have to find the X and click the ad away before you can do anything,
> because it covers the search box?
> Way to convince me NOT to go to your movie, moronic Pixar ad execs.

Since IMDb does that for EVERY danged movie/TV event now, I've learned
not to misplace my anger, and focus on the guilty parties responsible...
Show full article (0.98Kb)
no comments
Re: KUNG FU PANDA (Spoilers Welcome!)         


Author: Anim8rFSK
Date: Jun 12, 2008 20:20

In article ,
Derek Janssen nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
Show full article (1.34Kb)
no comments
Re: KUNG FU PANDA (Spoilers Welcome!)         


Date: Jun 12, 2008 20:25

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:19am-0700, Anim8rFSK cox.net>:
> In article <9AB3k.4048$1x.3190@trndny06>,
> Derek Janssen nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> Although hate to admit, the Weinsteins' "Igor" trailer doesn't...look
>> all that bad for a non-Pixar, although the Boxy Little Robot will still
>> triumph for the summer.
>
> I hate the Johnny Five ads so much . . .
>
> Have you gotten the one on IMDb, that appears OVER the page, and you
> have to find the X and click the ad away before you can do anything,
> because it covers the search box?
>
> Way to convince me NOT to go to your movie, moronic Pixar ad execs.
>

That's why I normally websurf with javascript off.
At least IMDB is stil usable with javascript off.

Laters. =)
Show full article (1.26Kb)
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: Eddie: Spoilers c. 5th - 8th of March - also spoiler Thursuk.media.radio.archers ·