| Re: If you could star in an animated version of your fave live action film,what would you choose ? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: rec.arts.animation · Group Profile
Author: Terrence BriggsTerrence Briggs Date: Apr 30, 2008 16:46
On Apr 29, 2:51Â pm, Anim8rFSK cox.net> wrote:> In article aioe.org>,
> Â "Patrick McNamara" yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> "Terrence Briggs" gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:b602cb44-4c88-45b9-ba00-9b32f0cc1588@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>> On Apr 25, 11:53 am, Anim8rFSK cox.net> wrote:>
>>>My point builds on Chuck's: A bad live-action film deserves better; so
>>>animate it!
>
>> Nowadays, there's really little difference between many live-action and
>> animated films. There's so much CG mixed in with the live stuff that it can
>> be hard to tell if a film like Transformers shouldn't be considered
>> live-action/animated.
>
>> Of course just making a film animated doesn't make it better. It's still
>> possible to do a bad animated film.
>
> The Don Bluth Lesson.
Heh. I'm not saying that the animated version would automatically be
better; I'm saying that animated works needn't be excluded simply
because a live-action version already exists. (The Brad Bird Lesson).
Terrence Briggs, can't use the USB connection on this library computer
for some reason. I blame iPodders.
Peace to you...
| 
