| Re: Gunslinger Girls - Worst Concept Ever!!! |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: rec.arts.animation · Group Profile
Author: Bill SteeleBill Steele Date: Apr 20, 2007 11:59
In article
hon-adsl-168-192.telekom.net.sb>,
Stainless Steel Rat newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article weber.videotron.net>,
> "Oliver Wong" castortech.com> wrote:>> I think part of the problem here is that neither side of the debate
>> have defined what they meant by the term "porn", and it is due to a
>> difference of definition that the sides are stuck.
>
> Actually, I've been very careful to avoid the terms "porn" or
> "pornography". I've kept to terms like "sexual" which have reasonably
> well-defined and accepted meanings.
Lots of great literature -- most of it, I suspect -- and lots more from
there on down contains sexual behavior, sexual references, sexual
undertones, sexual symbolism. It's part of life, and it's part of the
story. If it's part of the GG story, so be it. That makes it
objectionable no more than it does in Dracula, The Great Gatsby or Xena,
Warrior Princess. (Though I'm sure some people have objected to all of
those.)
| 
