> Warewolf writes:

>> Anything can be (mis)labelled as 'porn' with the right 'spin'/play on
>> words and it frustrates me to no end when arrogant, self-serving,
>> 'prudish' disgraces to humanity try to impose their own twisted,
>> *politically currupt* 'values' on the public at large, especially through
>> violence.

>
> What about those whose values aren't politically corrupt, and whose
> values aren't twisted, and don't try to impose them through violence,
> but still find things to be obscene, and try to make them available
> only to adults? Are you intentionally defining them out of existence?
> Why?