In article <6pvla4l5jr38fb5s3qt6dt8fd8ba01hvgc@
4ax.com>,
Antonio E. Gonzalez
aol.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:55:48 -0700, Anim8rFSK
cox.net>
> wrote:
> >>In article
news-out.mv.net>,
>> Gary McGath _MYLASTNAME_.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article <5dsga4t0b1evmshkh76d0chrun7llm0j6n@
4ax.com>,
>>> Antonio E. Gonzalez
aol.com> wrote:
>>> >>>> Re-read the article: these are hotel workers (maids, bell hops,
>>>> cooks), their only "costumes" are their hotel uniforms . . .
>>>
>>> It's a nice trick, asking people to "re-read the article" in the hope
>>> that they won't read it but just take your word for it. But the article
>>> says: "The arrest of the 32 protesters, many of whom wore costumes
>>> representing famous Disney characters..."
>>
>>Exactly. Plus, you know, if they weren't in costumes, how did
>>'Cinderella' get arrested? Much less Peter Pan, Mickey, Tinkerbell,
>>etc.?
>>
>
> They were wearing the costumes, thus the headline stands . . .
And when you said "their only "costumes" are their hotel uniforms" you
were lying.
>
>
>
> Which, of course, changes nothing; heck, it confirms the
> "Cinderella Arrested" part . . .
It confirms that you were lying.
>
>
>>Basically, everything Antonio E. Gonzalez said was a lie.
>
> Keep telling yourself that, reality speaks otherwise . . .
You're actually that stupid? In the face of being shown that everything
you said was a lie? Cites, articles, pictures? EVERYTHING you said was
a lie.
--
Multiple root canals; hopped up on multiple pain drugs.
It's an explanation, not an excuse!
