>In article news-out.mv.net>,
> Gary McGath _MYLASTNAME_.com> wrote:
>

>> In article <5dsga4t0b1evmshkh76d0chrun7llm0j6n@4ax.com>,
>> Antonio E. Gonzalez aol.com> wrote:
>>

>>> Re-read the article: these are hotel workers (maids, bell hops,
>>> cooks), their only "costumes" are their hotel uniforms . . .

>>
>> It's a nice trick, asking people to "re-read the article" in the hope
>> that they won't read it but just take your word for it. But the article
>> says: "The arrest of the 32 protesters, many of whom wore costumes
>> representing famous Disney characters..."

>
>Exactly. Plus, you know, if they weren't in costumes, how did
>'Cinderella' get arrested? Much less Peter Pan, Mickey, Tinkerbell,
>etc.?
>

>And a quick Google search shows them in costume:
>
>http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/08/406948.html
>
>http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23538019-details/Cinderella,+S
>now+White+and+Mickey+Mouse+arrested+as+police+clash+with+staff+at+Disneyl
>and/article.do
>

>Basically, everything Antonio E. Gonzalez said was a lie.