A Tale of Two Generations

by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

August 21, 2008 (LPAC) Any U.S. veteran of World War II who can think
back to the time of President John F. Kennedy's Administration, should
be asking today: Is a U.S. Bush Administration which continues to act
as a stooge of that former British Prime Minister Tony Blair who
brought us the continuing, and spreading, hopeless warfare in
Southwest Asia, setting the world up with a "Cuba Missile Crisis" in
reverse? Is the ghost of Khrushchev hovering inside the body of U.S.
Vice-President Dick Cheney? Or, has the George Soros who ran evil
errands for Hitler as an adolescent, who created the present lunatic
government of Georgia, and who has now virtually created the Barack
Obama candidacy, become a key player in bringing the world as a whole
into a thermonuclear showdown in August?

These are the kinds of questions reverberating through the halls of
governments around the world right now.

We are presently at the brink of global, thermonuclear war, and if we
unleash this war, as the current Bush Administration is threatening,
we lose civilization, worldwide, for generations to come. This is what
will probably happen, if we don't do what we have to do to end this
thermonuclear confrontation. This is the time you could lose
civilization quicker than you could say "Senator Barack Obama."

Is President George Bush, Jr. on "coke," perhaps? Or, is London's
puppet Dick Cheney presently in virtually total control of the White
House's inmates? Why this threat of general thermonuclear warfare at
this moment in history?

In recent world history since that 1890 ouster of Germany's Chancellor
Otto von Bismarck which cleared the way for the "World War" which
Bismarck warned would be the British Empire's launching of a new
"Seven Years War," there has been a remarkable coincidence, as right
now, between a threatened global "geopolitical" challenge to British
imperial power over the world, and the British empire's pushing other
nations into general warfare such as Japan's 1895-1945 warfare against
China, done at the prompting of Britain's Prince of Wales Edward
Albert. It is no coincidence that the present threat of outbreak of a
new "world war," the thermonuclear war we managed to avoid during the
1945-1989 interval, is a threat of a general war breaking, once again,
in the ominous month of August. It is no accident that the orders for
plunging the U.S.A, into this threatened world war come from Tony
Blair's Fabian London, as did World War I, and the placing of London's
choice Adolf Hitler into power in Germany. Britain prefers to have
others, once again, fall into the strategic trap of something like the
original "Seven Years War" of the Eighteenth Century and the
Napoleonic wars. However, the threat comes not from the United Kingdom
as such, but from the kinds of cabals of financier interests typified
by London's errand-boy and Senator Obama backer George Soros.

Make no mistake, today's Russia will not surrender to the present
thermonuclear posturing. A new, younger generation has come into
leadership in Russia. The present government of Russia will be
reasonable where it should be reasonable, but it will not accept the
destruction of its sovereignty, nor will it accept London-directed
efforts, using the fools in Washington as puppets, to bring Russia to
the degree of weakness that Russia could no longer resist the total
dismemberment now intended by London.

This new missiles-crisis is not coming from Bertrand Russell's crony
Khrushchev. It is important to review the history of that crisis, so
that we not be lured into imagining that there is anything like the
1962 missiles-crisis in the confrontation being staged on London's
orders to Washington today.

Then, in 1962, the Khrushchev who had reached an accommodation with
Bertrand Russell in the setting of Russell's London conference of his
World Parliamentarians for World Government, was acting as an
opportunist partner of Russell, on behalf of Russell's avowed,
continuing intention, since 1945-1946, of using what had seemed an
Anglo-American monopoly on nuclear weapons, to force the Soviet Union
to submit to "world government," as the U.S. complicity in British
operations in Georgia has made the same threat on behalf of
"globalization" today. For Khrushchev, the 1962 crisis was a strategic
gamble being orchestrated in collaboration with Bertrand Russell, a
gamble based on the model scenario of Russell crony H.G. Wells'
notorious scenario for world government, "The Shape of Things to
Come."

This time, the Anglo-American and Saudi financial cabal behind
London's Lisbon Treaty scheme for globalization, is playing for keeps.
(Representative Barney Frank is not the actual source of a threat of
general thermonuclear war.) Either Russia backs down, or globalization
is dead. The presently onrushing general breakdown-crisis of the
present world monetary-financial system, leaves no other options
available to the Anglo-American-Saudi financier partners. If Russia
survives as a sovereign nation, the presently onrushing general
financial collapse means that "globalization" is doomed. This time,
London is not gambling; it sees the crushing of Russia now as its only
way of maintaining imperial hegemony over the world at large. Without
Russia's capitulation, the United Kingdom becomes the little nations
of England, Wales, and Scotland (which is not a bad option for the
inhabitants of that Isle, if you think about that in a civilized
way).

Your best option, as a citizen of the U.S.A., is to think very, very
seriously about the upcoming major-party nominating conventions. If
you do not bring about the nomination of a combination of President
and Vice-President who reject the politics of the present nuclear
showdown which London's puppet, the George W. Bush Administration, is
staging, there might be, very soon, no United States as it exists
today, and perhaps no you, nor your city or town, or family, either.