|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: John BakerJohn Baker Date: Apr 14, 2008 14:28
Mention the subject of abortion and the word 'pro-choice' is bandied about
as if it were an all encompassing term. What about the child? Who speaks for
this little one? Do they not have a say? a 'choice'? After-all, it is their
life that's at stake. Their father is not allowed to protect him/her so that
leaves only one alternative; the law. Strong anti-abortion laws must be
written and enforced that protects the sanctity of all human life. We owe it
to the children.
--
John Baker
opinions1@ yahoo.com
" Live and let live "
|
| |
|
| | 2589 Comments |
|
|
Author: Mark SebreeMark Sebree Date: Apr 14, 2008 14:43
On Apr 14, 5:28 pm, "John Baker" yahoo.com> wrote:> Mention the subject of abortion and the word 'pro-choice' is bandied about
> as if it were an all encompassing term. What about the child?
What child? Children have been born. Perhaps if you used the correct
words for what you are talking about, you would not be seen as being
so dishonest.
> Who speaks for this little one?
You mean the embryo/fetus that is using the woman's body against her
will? Use that if it was a person, the woman would be justified in
defending herself with any force necessary to end that attack
immediately.
> Do they not have a say?
Since they are using the woman's body against her will and causing her
harm, no. An embryo/fetus has no more say that a mugger or a rapist
does when the woman fights back to defend herself, and the assailant
is harmed or killed by the defense.
Apparently, you think that the woman should let herself be raped or
mugged.
> a 'choice'? After-all, it is their life that's at stake.
|
| Show full article (2.23Kb) |
|
| | 78 Comments |
|
|
Date: Apr 14, 2008 14:55
"John Baker" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1pt7qq.42a.17.1@news.alt.net...> Mention the subject of abortion and the word 'pro-choice' is bandied about
> as if it were an all encompassing term. What about the child? Who speaks
> for this little one?
We all speak for the children.
But you are talking about a foetus, not a child.
|
| Show full article (0.78Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Chris B.Chris B. Date: Apr 14, 2008 15:09
"John Baker" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1pt7qq.42a.17.1@news.alt.net...> Mention the subject of abortion and the word 'pro-choice' is bandied about
> as if it were an all encompassing term. What about the child? Who speaks
> for this little one? Do they not have a say? a 'choice'? After-all, it is
> their life that's at stake. Their father is not allowed to protect him/her
> so that leaves only one alternative; the law. Strong anti-abortion laws
> must be written and enforced that protects the sanctity of all human life.
> We owe it to the children.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- ...
|
| Show full article (0.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: LCLC Date: Apr 14, 2008 15:09
Redundant fuckwit "John Baker" yahoo.com> aka "Auric Hellman"
volcanomail.com>wrote in message
news:1pt7qq.42a.17.1@news.alt.net...
> Mention the subject of abortion and the word 'pro-choice' is bandied about
> as if it were an all encompassing term.
It's simple and clear.
> What about the child? Who speaks for this little one? Do they not have a
> say? a 'choice'? After-all, it is their life that's at stake.
You're confusing "fetus" with "child" again, Auric.
Besides, given your history of drug abuse and all your NAMBLA posts, you
have no credibility on any issue involving children.
> Their father is not allowed to protect him/her so that leaves only one
> alternative; the law.
And the law says abortion is legal.
> Strong anti-abortion laws must be written and enforced
Ain't gonna happen.
> that protects the sanctity of all human life.
Even the "life" that you want destroyed?:
|
| Show full article (1.74Kb) |
| 21 Comments |
|
|
Author: BAMBAM Date: Apr 14, 2008 15:15
> On Apr 14, 5:28 pm, "John Baker" yahoo.com> wrote:>> Mention the subject of abortion and the word 'pro-choice' is bandied
>> about
>> as if it were an all encompassing term. What about the child?
>
> What child? Children have been born. Perhaps if you used the correct
> words for what you are talking about, you would not be seen as being
> so dishonest.
>
>> Who speaks for this little one?
>
> You mean the embryo/fetus that is using the woman's body against her
> will? Use that if it was a person, the woman would be justified in
> defending herself with any force necessary to end that attack
> immediately.
>
>> Do they not have a say?
> ...
|
| Show full article (2.61Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Mark SebreeMark Sebree Date: Apr 14, 2008 15:28
On Apr 14, 6:15 pm, "BAM" blahblahbellsouth.net> wrote:>> On Apr 14, 5:28 pm, "John Baker" yahoo.com> wrote:>>> Mention the subject of abortion and the word 'pro-choice' is bandied
>>> about
>>> as if it were an all encompassing term. What about the child?
>
>> What child? Children have been born. Perhaps if you used the correct
>> words for what you are talking about, you would not be seen as being
>> so dishonest.
>
>>> Who speaks for this little one?
>
>> You mean the embryo/fetus that is using the woman's body against her
>> will? Use that if it was a person, the woman would be justified in
>> defending herself with any force necessary to end that attack
>> immediately.
> ...
|
| Show full article (4.49Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: RobertRobert Date: Apr 14, 2008 15:58
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:55:55 -0400, "NewsGroups" wrote:
>"John Baker" yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:1pt7qq.42a.17.1@news.alt.net...>> Mention the subject of abortion and the word 'pro-choice' is bandied about
>> as if it were an all encompassing term. What about the child? Who speaks
>> for this little one?
>
>
>We all speak for the children.
>
>But you are talking about a foetus, not a child.
>
>Do they not have a say? a 'choice'? After-all, it is their
>> life that's at stake. Their father is not allowed to protect him/her so
>> that leaves only one alternative; the law. Strong anti-abortion laws must
>> be written and enforced that protects the sanctity of all human life. We
>> owe it to the children.
|
| Show full article (0.90Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: JSMJSM Date: Apr 14, 2008 18:29
On Apr 14, 2:28 pm, "John Baker" yahoo.com> wrote:> Mention the subject of abortion and the word 'pro-choice' is bandied about
> as if it were an all encompassing term. What about the child? Who speaks for
> this little one? Do they not have a say? a 'choice'? After-all, it is their
> life that's at stake. Their father is not allowed to protect him/her so that
> leaves only one alternative; the law. Strong anti-abortion laws must be
> written and enforced that protects the sanctity of all human life. We owe it
> to the children.
>
> --
> John Baker
> opinio...@ yahoo.com
>
> " Live and let live "
If a 'fetus' were a baby than the mother would be arrested for doing
things like drinking, smoking, being around others that smoked, taking
any kind of illegal drugs, even participating in risky sports and an
inquest would be held every miscarriage.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Ray FischerRay Fischer Date: Apr 14, 2008 19:19
John Baker yahoo.com> wrote:>Mention the subject of abortion and the word 'pro-choice' is bandied about
>as if it were an all encompassing term. What about the child?
What about the hundreds of children you callously choose to let die
every day, nazi turd?
> Who speaks for
>this little one?
Certainly not you, nazi turd. All you do is advocate death for
everybody who doesn't obey your evil cult.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
