Author: emvmvmfemvmvmf Date: Jan 2, 2008 02:28
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= why the. security services? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
You may ask, why do. I think the "they" referred to are the security
services? Is there any evidence that there is a single source,. as opposed
to a. loosely based "whispering campaign" amongst many people? Even if there
is. a single source, is there any evidence that "they" are professional
"buggers". as opposed to amateurs, or perhaps people working for a privately
funded. organization?
a) As to the question of a single. source versus something more fragmented;
it is quite obvious that. there is a single source from the way the campaign
has been carried out.. Since things have been repeated verbatim which were
said in my. home, there must be one group which does the watching and
listening. Since on several occasions (mainly during travel) people. have
been planted in close. proximity and rehearsed in what they were to say, it
follows that someone must have done the planning for that,. and again a
single source. is indicated.
|