Up |
|
|
  |
Author: tneelytneely
Date: Nov 20, 2006 18:10
I'm trying to build C LDAP API from the source cldap_src-2006.10.16.
Everything runs well till the Makefile reports this:
------------ after the libraries compiled ok ------
ranlib .libs/libldapsdk.a
creating libldapsdk.la
(cd .libs && rm -f libldapsdk.la && ln -s ../libldapsdk.la libldapsdk.la)
if test "no" = "no"; then
rm -f ../libldapsdk.la
d=`pwd`; d=`basename $d`; cd ..; ln -s $d/libldapsdk.la
libldapsdk.la;
t=`basename libldapsdk.la .la`.a; rm -f $t; ln -s $d/.libs/$t $t;
fi
basename: missing operand
What is wrong with the basename call??? Running SUSE 10.1
Thanks in advance
T
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: devi.lakshmi.sdevi.lakshmi.s
Date: Nov 20, 2006 05:46
Hi,
I have a LDAP server which has IPV6 support and has IPV6
configured address.When I try to connect to the LDAP server with its
IPV6 address,the ldap_simple_bind_s() functions fails with the error
code 81 which corresponds to LDAP_SERVER_DOWN.
But with an IPV4 address I am able to connect to the same sever and
able to search too.
Can anyone help me out as to what could be teh problem?I am using teh
winldap.h of VC98.
Thanks in Advance
Lucky.
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: François LumineauFrançois Lumineau
Date: Nov 15, 2006 01:47
Hi !
As it was a new server with no production services, i've finally
reinitialized it. Download DVD iso and install as a new server. It's OK
now...
So, i haven't found any real solution.
Bye everyone!
"Fran
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author:
Date: Nov 14, 2006 15:55
> nobody
> is behind anymore to fix the bugs.
Actually for the ldap sdk bugs, there is a very responsive engineering team
that is still there. In fact, it may be that I got in the way as a middle
man. A lot of posts here on the ldap forum are bug reports. And I know
that on the libc forum, Jeff is doing a heroic job of responding. But I
understand your concern. And I thank you for your kind words.
Thank you
Susan
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author:
Date: Nov 14, 2006 15:51
> The devsup sysop program has stoppend, that is what I tried to say. The
> support sysop program is still there.
Hmm... that wasn't what I heard. If you want me to dig into that please
email me at sperrin at novell dot com.
Thank you
Susan
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: GuenterGuenter
Date: Nov 14, 2006 11:42
> I have been moved to another group within Novell so responding to the
> devsup newsgroups is no longer on my official work responsibilities.
> I've been pretty busy with training and not responsive here I know.
good to hear that you're still there -- bad though for us all that you are no
longer available for the NDS, LDAP and ActiveX forums.
No sysop has the skill that you brought in.
Also for me its _now_ senseless to make changes to the bug system when nobody
is behind anymore to fix the bugs.
Ok, got it finally: NetWare is DEAD!
And honestly spoken it was already dead for me last year when Russ and all
the other had to leave - I was just hoping I could move some smoother towards
Linux, but seems not so.
Wish you best with your new job!
greets, Guen.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author:
Date: Nov 14, 2006 08:00
Hi
I have been moved to another group within Novell so responding to the devsup
newsgroups is no longer on my official work responsibilities. I've been
pretty busy with training and not responsive here I know.
The sysops are still active, and will have backline help as needed from
within Novell. I don't believe that any of the news groups has been
terminated. I've asked engineering team for these sdks to make bug reporting
more accessable to public (like how the csharpldap sdk bugzilla works)
since, in my experience, these forums are a very good source of bug reports.
For the most part the doc and samples cover most useage issues.
Thank you
Susan
|
| |
|
2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Hans BooneHans Boone
Date: Nov 13, 2006 09:44
Hi Guenter,
It is very simple the developer support group has been terminated.
Hans Boone
Hans.at.hbware.com
Guenter wrote:
> Hi,
> when I look through our forums I see that the last posts from Susan are from
> 10-Oct - and I really doubt that Susan makes more than a month holidays....
> so it seems to me that she had to leave Novell too.... --- but I still hope
> that this is not the case.....
> But if it is then its a shame! She was the only one from developer support
> who always took our needs seriously, and always helped us all with her very
> good NDS and LDAP knowledge.
>
> Susan, hope you're still there!!
>
> Guen.
>
|
| |
|
2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: GuenterGuenter
Date: Nov 13, 2006 09:42
Hi,
when I look through our forums I see that the last posts from Susan are from
10-Oct - and I really doubt that Susan makes more than a month holidays....
so it seems to me that she had to leave Novell too.... --- but I still hope
that this is not the case.....
But if it is then its a shame! She was the only one from developer support
who always took our needs seriously, and always helped us all with her very
good NDS and LDAP knowledge.
Susan, hope you're still there!!
Guen.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: François LumineauFrançois Lumineau
Date: Nov 7, 2006 06:27
Hi all !
I have a LDAP server on Netware 6.5 SP6 (same problem with SP5) and eDir
88SP1. I've configured a proxy usered with more rights than public access.
It's works well !!
For more security i've restricted the user to the Server IP... and crash !
This action does an intruder lockout on my proxy user !
I've had a look on dstrace but it says that the user is restricted (yes but
normally on the server ip !!!)
Have no ideas any more...
Thanks for any help
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fran
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|