|
|
 Up |
|
  |
Author: rasmanrasman
Date: Jun 8, 2010 04:53
On 7 Jun 2010 05:27:55 -0700, Cindy newsguy.com> wrote:
>I just found my post from May 2009 and it was $2.49 then. Right now, it is
>around $2.85. How about you?
>
>Cin
Not sure about a year ago, but 2.79 in the southwest burbs of Chicago.
4 miles away it is running 3.05.
Rob
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Bob BergerBob Berger
Date: Jun 8, 2010 04:53
In article drn.newsguy.com>, Bob Berger says...>>
>>I just found my post from May 2009 and it was $2.49 then. Right now, it is
>>around $2.85. How about you?
>>
>>Cin
>
>Oh darn. When I read the Subject Line, I thought you were posting to tell us
>that Newsguy was sending its users checks to cover the cost of gas the next
>couple weeks. :-)
>
>Anyway, I'll check the prices when I'm in town this morning, and report back.
>
>Request: When folks do report their local gas prices, please include your
>location. Thanks.
In Spokane, Washington the price for regular at Safeway is $2.92, at Costco it's
$2.91; however around town I saw several $2.95s and $2.97s.
|
| Show full article (0.88Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: David C KiferDavid C Kifer
Date: Jun 7, 2010 22:42
Bob Berger wrote:
>
> Interesting to say the least.
>
> The longer they're in office the more incompetent the Obama administration
> looks. Maybe they're really the O'bumbler administration, or maybe they're
> trying to surpass the Carter administration's mismanagement record.
> What we have here is an Obama solution for which there is no known problem.
> Trying to save print media journalism in the 21st century makes about as much
> sense as trying to save the buggy whip industry in the 20th.
>
> UNLESS... The real agenda is for the administration to gain influence over
> content and view point.
Precisely. All about control.
|
| Show full article (1.39Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: David C KiferDavid C Kifer
Date: Jun 7, 2010 22:42
Rich wrote:
> On 6 Jun 2010 09:46:59 -0700, David C Kifer wrote...
>> JRogow wrote:
>>> I often say that I live in a library with a kitchen.
>> LOL!
>> Good description, I think I'll steal it!
>> :-)>
>> Here's a contest: How many feet of bookshelves do you have? You know, a
>> four-foot-wide bookcase with four shelves is 16 feet of shelf.
>>
>> Me?
>> 337 feet.
>> In a trailer.
>> :-)>
>>
>
> How do you count books in boxes stashed away in the garage? Had to make room for
> the flood of kids books. : ) I might have to invest in some larger book shelves
> one of these days.
|
| Show full article (0.88Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: David C KiferDavid C Kifer
Date: Jun 7, 2010 22:42
Mark A wrote:
--
Dave
"Tam multi libri, tam breve tempus!"
(Et brevis pecunia.) [Et breve spatium.]
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: David C KiferDavid C Kifer
Date: Jun 7, 2010 22:42
JRogow wrote:
> David C Kifer wrote:
>> JRogow wrote:
>>>
>>> I often say that I live in a library with a kitchen.
>>
>> LOL! Good description, I think I'll steal it! :-)> Here's a
>> contest: How many feet of bookshelves do you have? You know, a
>> four-foot-wide bookcase with four shelves is 16 feet of shelf.
>>
>> Me? 337 feet. In a trailer. :-)>
>>
>
> Oh, I forgot a friend who has a very long living room that has
> library stacks - DH refuses to allow me to do that. Great idea,
> though.
I've considered that, but trailer rooms tend to be rather smallish.
Haven't quite decided to take that next step. Yet!
:-)>
|
| Show full article (0.73Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: David C KiferDavid C Kifer
Date: Jun 7, 2010 22:42
JRogow wrote:
> David C Kifer wrote:
>> JRogow wrote:
>>>
>>> I often say that I live in a library with a kitchen.
>>
>> LOL!
>> Good description, I think I'll steal it!
>> :-)>
>> Here's a contest: How many feet of bookshelves do you have? You know,
>> a four-foot-wide bookcase with four shelves is 16 feet of shelf.
>>
>> Me?
>> 337 feet.
>> In a trailer.
>> :-)>
>>
>
> I have you beat . . . but not by much (unless you count the barn and the
> front porch). ...
|
| Show full article (0.71Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: BobBob
Date: Jun 7, 2010 22:08
On 7 Jun 2010 10:22:32 -0700, Rich said...
>
>On 7 Jun 2010 07:35:58 -0700, Bob wrote...
>
>I've read there's a building they need to tear down to build it, but they may
>declare that building a historic landmark that they won't be able to touch.
>
>That one lady's reference to it being a flag of conquest rather than an olive
>branch was interesting. With comments like "We have the right to build this
>building..." and "We can just go ahead and build without permissions...", it ...
|
| Show full article (1.88Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: JoeJoe
Date: Jun 7, 2010 21:18
So I voted for my primary candidate today, LaPage. The guy's about half way
between right wing and anarchist, but he is a tax cutter and a government
reducer, and he is supported by the Tea Party folks.
Cin, on the other hand, voted Rosa, the lefty pinko who vowed to increase
entitlements and expand government until it is breast feeding all of society.
Sometimes you just never know.
Confused and conflagrated on Wolverton Mountain.
--
I'm Gumby, dammit, and don't forget it!
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
