Re: Crossposting and abuse in general
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
news.admin.netabuse.usenet only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

news.admin.netabuse.usenet Profile…
 Up
Re: Crossposting and abuse in general         


Author: Anton
Date: Mar 25, 2008 23:39

Gary L. Burnore kirjoitti:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:16:22 +0200, Anton gmail.com>
> wrote:
> Anyone can edit a wiki. It means nothing.

Perhaps. There are however plenty of credible sources that support the
view I advocate:

http://faqs.cs.uu.nl/na-dir/finding-groups/general.html

"Subject: Crossposting to multiple newsgroups

Think very carefully before crossposting to more than one, or perhaps
two, newsgroups. It is considered highly inappropriate to broadcast
your message to a wide selection of newsgroups merely to have more
people read it."

http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/xpost.html

"Generally, you should not post to a group before reading its rules,
which might be found in its FAQ."

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/nordic-faq/part1_INTRODUCTION/section-2.html

"1.3.5 What about cross-postings?
Show full article (2.69Kb)
3 Comments
Re: Crossposting and abuse in general         


Author: Seth
Date: Mar 27, 2008 11:02

In article freenews.iinet.net.au>,
Andy wrote:
>Is this really on-topic for NANAU?

Discussing whether Usenet posts are abuse is certainly on topic for
NANAU.

Seth
no comments
pieni kikkeliset hyypiöt         


Author: Markku Grönroos
Date: Apr 1, 2008 01:38

menes nyt perverssi muualle

"Gary L. Burnore" databasix.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:fsrmq5$jdf$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:09:15 +0300, Anton gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Gary L. Burnore...
Show full article (1.75Kb)
no comments
Re: Crossposting and abuse in general         


Author: Anton
Date: Apr 11, 2008 04:27

Gary L. Burnore kirjoitti:
> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:09:15 +0300, Anton gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Gary L. Burnore kirjoitti:
>>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:39:00 +0200, Anton gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> Should but are not required to. YOU can ignore it. YOU can ignore MY
>>> posts but you choose not to. Says something about YOU.
>> Are you DISCOURAGING a debate here, or what is your agenda? Are you
>> acting as a advocate of free speech, yet at the same time as soon as
>> somebody disagrees with you you are asking your opponent to killfile you
>> in order to not be able to argue with you?
> Are you really this clueless?

You didn't have anything to say /this/ time either? What a surprise.
>> Some seem to wish that the "old school of Usenet" should just cave in,
> Yawn. Death of USENet, film at 11. If you don't like it, don't
> fucking read it.

I don't, but what has that to do with what I like or don't like?
Show full article (0.97Kb)
no comments