On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:54:20 -0400, Pudentame
wrote:

|>>
|>
|>Google makes an archive of the usenet groups they provide an access
|>point through Google Groups. They do seem to honor the X-no-archive: flag
|>
|>If you send a cancel for one of your own posts, it will propagate with
|>the same efficiency as the initial post.
|>
|>If you change your mind after you hit send, you have a better chance of
|>killing the post if you cancel it right away than if you have second
|>thoughts later.

X-no-archive: is just a request that may not be easy to handel by all the
NNTP servers.....

I find most NNTP servers to X-no-archive: Yes, to still be displayed
in the 1st download of the headers.....A lot of NNTPs will delete it, but
not so much these days.

Last-modified: 2003-10-04 (revision 1.14)
Posted-by: postfaq 1.15 (Perl 5.8.8)
Archive-name: net-abuse-faq/newsgroups
URL: http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/nana-groups.html
Original-author: Fluffy usa.net>
Posting-frequency: weekly

We have a plentiful selection of newsgroups about network abuse and
related issues, but what is the best one to use? Here are excerpts from
the newsgroups' charters, with emphasis added to help make things clear.
Please refer to the full charters, URLs included here when available, if
you would like more detail.

If you want to learn more about network abuse -- what it is, what can be
done about it and just what all those acronyms mean -- Tim Skirvin has
pointers to more sources of information at:

<http://www.killfile.org/~tskirvin/nana/>

Thank you for following these recommendations. It will make these
newsgroups more useful for all involved.

Network Abuse Newsgroups: