|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Author: TesterTester
Date: Jan 29, 2007 20:54
I keep on seeing all these blogspot URL's spamvertsed as sexsites and
I can't find anything like a sexsite referral link to LART. In fact, I
don't see any sexual content on this site. It's almost as weird as MI5
boy.
|
| Show full article (1.33Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: nukleusnukleus
Date: Jan 29, 2007 09:29
In article <12rr0jiq2t78489@ news.supernews.com>, "Martin X. Moleski, SJ"
canisius.edu> wrote:>On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 03:32:00 +0200, Aatu Koskensilta
> wrote in
>:
>>> ... I believe the process could be a whole lot more informal than it
>>is now.
>
>Heh heh.
>
>If you'd like to suggest what specific steps or aspects you'd like
>to knock out, let me know.
Huh?
And WHO do you think you are on the first place?
Herr fuehrer himself?
And even if someone "lets you know",
what is THAT supposed to mean?
|
| Show full article (1.92Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: nukleusnukleus
Date: Jan 29, 2007 09:29
In article <5sjqr2lfup1vgcipn2p0pl10b8o26f1ov7@ 4ax.com>, Aratzio
sneakemail.com> wrote:>On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 03:32:00 +0200, Aatu Koskensilta
> got double secret probation because:
>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>> There are whole other reasons besides being a bunch of control
>>> freaks to dislike the board. First among them is the bureaucratic
>>> morass they are creating by adding rules to the process rather
>>> than minimizing the steps and simplifying.
>>
>>As surprising as it might seem to you, here I'm actually inclined to
>>agree: I believe the process could be a whole lot more informal than it
>>is now. But I'm not on the board, and I'm quite confident they've
>>considered all this stuff already.
>
>Yes, they agreed it was too cumbersome, so they added more steps.
>
>>
>>> Their claims of protecting proponents by creating the group you moderate ...
|
| Show full article (6.87Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: nukleusnukleus
Date: Jan 29, 2007 09:29
In article , Aatu
Koskensilta wrote:>Aratzio wrote:
>> There are whole other reasons besides being a bunch of control
>> freaks to dislike the board. First among them is the bureaucratic
>> morass they are creating by adding rules to the process rather
>> than minimizing the steps and simplifying.
>
>As surprising as it might seem to you, here I'm actually inclined
said da funken weasel.
>to
>agree: I believe
It is not just a matter of belief,
it is a matter of what do you do about it.
>the process could be a whole lot more informal than it
>is now.
So...
What do we DO about it NOW?
>But I'm not on the board,
|
| Show full article (9.53Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Ali Hamid Mohd OsmanAli Hamid Mohd Osman
Date: Jan 29, 2007 05:41
Forward the forge cancel header to abuse@t-ipnet.de and
abuse@ wmid.amu.edu.pl and post
complaints to this URL http://abuse.t-ipnet.de/
What a dumb fucktard goat fucking dirty shitskin mohammadan islamist
terrorist scum that Turdk baba bey is.
-------------------
Subject: cancel <1153920981.518688.132540@ i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
From: "hbszsvnbjo-bu-hnbjm.dpn.bwfh" gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:55:11 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups:
soc.culture.europe,alt.religion.islam,soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.iranian,soc.culture.turkish
Path:
news.cn99.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news.rediris.es!kanaga.switch.ch!switch.ch!news-fra1.dfn.de!newsfeed.pionier.net.pl!news.task.gda.pl!news.amu.edu.pl!news.wmid.amu.edu.pl!usenet!not-for-mail
Newsgroups:
soc.culture.europe,alt.religion.islam,soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.iranian,soc.culture.turkish
|
| Show full article (1.69Kb) |
|
7 Comments |
|
|
Author: Aatu KoskensiltaAatu Koskensilta
Date: Jan 28, 2007 19:44
Frank Slootweg wrote:
> Peter Olcott seescreen.com> wrote:>> This is group is the closest that I could figure to be the proper channels.
>
> Perhaps then you should ask instead of complain.
>
> AFAIK, the most proper channel used to be news.groups. Now it *may*
> *also* be news.groups.proposals.
The group news.groups.proposals is for discussion of "active proposals",
that is proposals for new newsgroups, removal of newsgroups, and so on,
for which an official Request for Discussion announcement has been
posted to the news.announce.newgroups. For general policy discussion,
such as debating the merits of appending ".moderated" to every moderated
group, news.groups should be used.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xortec.fi)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: JoinedJoined
Date: Jan 28, 2007 17:54
On 2007-01-28 20:16:16 -0500, ImaDawg null.com> said:
> In article <2007012815151175249-Joined@Twinscom>, Joined
> Twins.com> wrote:
>
|
| Show full article (5.24Kb) |
|
2 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
