|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: tjabtjab Date: May 20, 2008 11:18
In article earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
Larry y.com> wrote:>> Larry wrote:
>>> In article
>>> newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>, MB
>>> whittehouse.govv> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article
>>>> earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>, Larry
>>>> y.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Have you even read the TOS of you newsserver and isp?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have never accessed information in excess of the authorization
>>>>> granted to me by my ISP. Have you?
>>>>
>>>> How would you know unless you have completely read the terms of ...
|
| Show full article (3.18Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Reality_CheckĀ©Reality_CheckĀ© Date: May 20, 2008 14:34
> In article earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
> Larry y.com> wrote:>>In article <69ggbhF336tu3U1@ mid.individual.net>,
>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" jonez.net> wrote:
>>>>> Larry wrote:
>>>> In article
>>>> newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>, MB
>>>> whittehouse.govv> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>> earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>, Larry
>>>>> y.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you even read the TOS of you newsserver and isp?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have never accessed information in excess of the authorization
>>>>>> granted to me by my ISP. Have you? ...
|
| Show full article (3.08Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: CynicCynic Date: May 21, 2008 04:04
On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:07:24 -0400, Larry y.com> wrote:
>I'm writing this response without abiding by either of your terms and
>conditions.
>
>See if you can get the feds to prosecute me, fool. Or if you have a
>cognizant case for breach of contract.
You have just proved the point that the PP was making. Breaking the
terms of a AUP or TOS *cannot* result in any criminal proceedings
(unless the action is also against the law of the land), and is
unlikely to result in civil action either. The worst that is normally
possible is that you are denied the service you paid for.
--
Cynic
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Shmuel (Seymour J.) MetzShmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Date: May 20, 2008 14:34
In <69err6F329sp3U1@ mid.individual.net>, on 05/19/2008
at 08:35 PM, "_ Prof. Jonez _" jonez.net> said:
>Save it for your Tribunal you fascist swine.
Do you even know what the word means, tonto?
*PLONK*
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, truly insane Spews puppet
< http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive
E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact
me. Do not reply to spamtrap@ library.lspace.org
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DeadratDeadrat Date: May 21, 2008 11:31
Cynic yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
news:390834pkag0qahoqjh91u18ni8akoms0s6@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:07:24 -0400, Larry y.com> wrote:
> >>I'm writing this response without abiding by either of your terms and
>>conditions.
>>
>>See if you can get the feds to prosecute me, fool. Or if you have a
>>cognizant case for breach of contract.
>
> You have just proved the point that the PP was making.
Hardly. There's no contract here, for one. It takes two, and cyber
contracts require an explicit acceptance.
> Breaking the
> terms of a AUP or TOS *cannot* result in any criminal proceedings
> (unless the action is also against the law of the land), and is
> unlikely to result in civil action either.
|
| Show full article (1.08Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: SethSeth Date: May 21, 2008 11:58
>Seth wrote:
>> Reality_Check
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: SethSeth Date: May 21, 2008 11:59
In article 4ax.com>,
richard newsguy.com> wrote:>On Mon, 19 May 2008 16:20:32 +0000 (UTC), sethb@ panix.com (Seth)
>wrote:
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
Author: SethSeth Date: May 21, 2008 12:01
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: SethSeth Date: May 21, 2008 12:06
In article earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
Larry y.com> wrote:
[boilerplate nonsense elided]
>You really have an unhealthy obsession with me. Move on with your life.
^^^^^^^^^
Objection: assumption of facts not in evidence.
Seth
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: DeadratDeadrat Date: May 21, 2008 12:22
>>Seth wrote:
>>> Reality_Check
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
