UK spammers activity report March 2008
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
news.admin.netabuse.email only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

news.admin.netabuse.email Profile…
 Up
UK spammers activity report March 2008         


Author: simon14061
Date: Mar 11, 2008 07:04

There has been a worring increase in UK spam in the last 3 years, and
the
situation seems to be getting worse at an accelerating rate, no doubt
partly due to the UK's interpertation of the EU Privacy and Electronic
Communications directive.

Much is directed at role accounts (sales@ and info@ co.uk domains)
but harvested addresses are also being targeted.

As you can see from the data below domain based blacklists are proving
somewhat effective at blocking this spam, with surbl.org and uribl.com
both
necessary and complimentary. The most surprising aspect to me was how
few
IP addresses used by UK spammers were listed by DNSBLs. uceprotect.net
had the most sources listed but even so that was a minority of the
active
spammers.
Show full article (6.17Kb)
13 Comments
Re: UK spammers activity report March 2008         


Author: foo
Date: Mar 11, 2008 15:20

E-Business Reach Ltd is a partner company of Packet Media Ltd, whose details
are available from www.packetmedia.co.uk

Regards
no comments
Re: UK spammers activity report March 2008         


Author: Steve Linford
Date: Mar 12, 2008 00:40

In article
<0c24ddd9-1e3f-45f1-852b-38793403f8b7@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
simon14061@yahoo.com wrote:
> There has been a worring increase in UK spam in the last 3 years,
> and the situation seems to be getting worse at an accelerating
> rate, no doubt partly due to the UK's interpertation of the EU
> Privacy and Electronic Communications directive.

The UK spam problem, which is a problem of UK spammers claiming their
spam is permitted by the Privacy Directive, is a problem created by
the DTI and is a problem waiting for the DTI to fix.
Show full article (2.60Kb)
no comments
Re: UK spammers activity report March 2008         


Author: chris greville
Date: Mar 12, 2008 03:13

"Steve Linford" spamhaus.org> wrote in message
news:linford-2D60A8.08402512032008@news.supernews.com...
>
> The solution to the UK spam problem is really waiting for a new DTI
> committee who ask the recipients of spam instead of asking the direct
> marketing industry. Fortunately for them the DTI itself sits behind
> strong spam filters and consequently those whose job it is to
> understand Britain's spam problem do not see much of the problem to
> begin with.
>

My irony meter just pinged. Can we take it that they use Spamhaus?
no comments
Re: UK spammers activity report March 2008         


Author: warren.sealey
Date: Mar 12, 2008 03:38

On 12 Mar, 10:13, "chris greville" nooospam.hotmail.co>
wrote:
> My irony meter just pinged. Can we take it that they use Spamhaus?

Have a look at the mx records for berr.gov.uk

Steve Linford for PM!
no comments
Re: UK spammers activity report March 2008         


Author: Steve Linford
Date: Mar 12, 2008 08:48

In article <63polfF28s82oU1@mid.individual.net>,
"chris greville" nooospam.hotmail.co> wrote:
> "Steve Linford" spamhaus.org> wrote in message
> news:linford-2D60A8.08402512032008@news.supernews.com...
>
>>
>> The solution to the UK spam problem is really waiting for a new DTI
>> committee who ask the recipients of spam instead of asking the direct
>> marketing industry. Fortunately for them the DTI itself sits behind
>> strong spam filters and consequently those whose job it is to
>> understand Britain's spam problem do not see much of the problem to
>> begin with.
>>
>
> My irony meter just pinged. Can we take it that they use Spamhaus?

They sure do. But not directly from us but via a company that handles
filtering for the UK government and which in turn uses Spamhaus BLs.
Show full article (1.10Kb)
no comments
Re: UK spammers activity report March 2008         


Author: chris greville
Date: Mar 12, 2008 09:06

"Steve Linford" spamhaus.org> wrote in message
news:linford-08FBD4.16485212032008@news.supernews.com...
> In article <63polfF28s82oU1@mid.individual.net>,
> "chris greville" nooospam.hotmail.co> wrote:
>
>> "Steve Linford" spamhaus.org> wrote in message
>> news:linford-2D60A8.08402512032008@news.supernews.com...
>>
>>>
>>> The solution to the UK spam problem is really waiting for a new DTI
>>> committee who ask the recipients of spam instead of asking the direct
>>> marketing industry. Fortunately for them the DTI itself sits behind
>>> strong spam filters and consequently those whose job it is to
>>> understand Britain's spam problem do not see much of the problem to
>>> begin with.
>>>
>>
>> My irony meter just pinged. Can we take it that they use Spamhaus?
>
> They sure do. But not directly from us but via a company that handles ...
Show full article (1.29Kb)
no comments
Re: UK spammers activity report March 2008         


Author: ()
Date: Mar 12, 2008 15:07

In article <63qdjcF28927pU1@mid.individual.net>,
chris greville nooospam.hotmail.co> wrote:
>You could use those facts on your letter headings.
>
>"As used by HM government, the US government and 99.9%% of US Courts"

Or turn them off for a day .
no comments
Re: UK spammers activity report March 2008         


Author: Daniel W. Johnson
Date: Mar 12, 2008 15:30

Steve Linford spamhaus.org> wrote:
> They sure do. But not directly from us but via a company that handles
> filtering for the UK government and which in turn uses Spamhaus BLs.

On the off-chance that someone in the DTI actually supported a spammer's
claim, how long would it take to cut off their Spamhaus filtering?
--
Daniel W. Johnson
panoptes@iquest.net
http://members.iquest.net/~panoptes/
039 53 36 N / 086 11 55 W
no comments
Re: UK spammers activity report March 2008         


Author: Chris U
Date: Mar 13, 2008 01:43

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:40:25 +0100, Steve Linford
spamhaus.org> wrote:
>To make matters worse, the DTI
>ensured there would be nobody to enforce the law anyway, despite
>thousands of complaints the UK Privacy Commissioner has taken no
>action at all against any UK spammer.
>
>--
> Steve Linford

Steve have you been following the news about a company called Phorm
and their link up with BT Talk Talk and Virgin Media ???

When it 1st broke the system was designed to be "Opt out" only, any
users who opted put have to keep an Opt out cookie or they will
automatically be opted back in.

Lot's of info about on the El Reg site plus a growing number of other
mainstream media sites now, El Reg link below has a lot of recent
published items about it

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/29/phorm_roundup/

The Phorm files
Show full article (8.09Kb)
no comments
 
1 2