|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Date: May 6, 2008 04:21
On Mon, 5 May 2008 19:17:28 -0700 (PDT), James W Anderson
hotmail.com> wrote:
I've made many complaints to the do not call list. I have yet to see
any action on any of the complaints. What a joke.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: NetworkElfNetworkElf Date: May 6, 2008 05:02
On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:21:43 -0500, spammers wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2008 19:17:28 -0700 (PDT), James W Anderson
> hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> I've made many complaints to the do not call list. I have yet to see
> any action on any of the complaints. What a joke.
Ah, yes. Of course, since the FCC doesn't have a hotline setup just for
you, waiting for the opportunity to slap down some unwelcome caller at
your phone number, then the whole list must be a joke. That makes perfect
sense. After all, if it's not working for you, then it's obviously not
working for anyone and must be a complete waste of time.
|
| Show full article (1.23Kb) |
| 3 Comments |
|
|
Author: CaryCary Date: May 6, 2008 06:17
On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:21:43 -0500, spammers wrote:
>On Mon, 5 May 2008 19:17:28 -0700 (PDT), James W Anderson
> hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>I've made many complaints to the do not call list. I have yet to see
>any action on any of the complaints. What a joke.
|
| Show full article (0.86Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DGDevinDGDevin Date: May 6, 2008 10:34
NetworkElf wrote:
>> I've made many complaints to the do not call list. I have yet to see
>> any action on any of the complaints. What a joke.
>
> Ah, yes. Of course, since the FCC doesn't have a hotline setup just
> for you, waiting for the opportunity to slap down some unwelcome
> caller at your phone number, then the whole list must be a joke. That
> makes perfect sense. After all, if it's not working for you, then
> it's obviously not working for anyone and must be a complete waste of
> time.
|
| Show full article (1.27Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Larry The Mason from HolbrookLarry The Mason from Holbrook Date: May 6, 2008 12:27
On May 6, 10:34 am, "DGDevin" wrote:
> If {a}
> company can operate apparently for years without any level of govt. having
> the interest or the ability to intervene then it doesn't seem unreasonable
> to conclude that the Do Not Call List is considerably less effective than it
> should be.
It can be no more effective than it is until the bells of the world
figure out how to secure their own networks and locate these
violators. I wouldn't be surprised that there are some pinkhat bells.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Fred the Red ShirtFred the Red Shirt Date: May 6, 2008 12:47
On May 6, 3:27 pm, Larry The Mason from Holbrook
gmail.com> wrote:> On May 6, 10:34 am, "DGDevin" wrote:
>
>> If {a}
>> company can operate apparently for years without any level of govt. having
>> the interest or the ability to intervene then it doesn't seem unreasonable
>> to conclude that the Do Not Call List is considerably less effective than it
>> should be.
>
> It can be no more effective than it is until the bells of the world
> figure out how to secure their own networks and locate these
> violators. I wouldn't be surprised that there are some pinkhat bells.
Just because they don't secure their networks doesn't
mean they don't know how to secure their networks.
They already know which spammers they host. If Spamhaus
can locate them, surely the ISPs can too. If nothing else,
the need only ask Spamhaus.
--
|
| Show full article (0.94Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: D. StussyD. Stussy Date: May 6, 2008 14:48
wrote in message
news:fnf024tp3l0andl878615lqfnvq5uhqi1j@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 5 May 2008 19:17:28 -0700 (PDT), James W Anderson
> hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
> I've made many complaints to the do not call list. I have yet to see
> any action on any of the complaints. What a joke.
The states' Attorney Generals' offices do a much better job than either the
FCC or FTC in enforcing problems with DNC violators.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: TUKATUKA Date: May 6, 2008 21:28
On 2008-05-06, NetworkElf networkelf.net> wrote:> On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:21:43 -0500, spammers wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 5 May 2008 19:17:28 -0700 (PDT), James W Anderson
>> hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> I've made many complaints to the do not call list. I have yet to see
>> any action on any of the complaints. What a joke.
>
> Ah, yes. Of course, since the FCC doesn't have a hotline setup just for
> you, waiting for the opportunity to slap down some unwelcome caller at
> your phone number, then the whole list must be a joke. That makes perfect ...
|
| Show full article (1.35Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: stinkystinky Date: May 8, 2008 14:40
> On May 6, 10:34 am, "DGDevin" wrote:
>> If {a}
>> company can operate apparently for years without any level of govt. having
>> the interest or the ability to intervene then it doesn't seem unreasonable
>> to conclude that the Do Not Call List is considerably less effective than it
>> should be.
>
> It can be no more effective than it is until the bells of the world
> figure out how to secure their own networks and locate these
> violators. I wouldn't be surprised that there are some pinkhat bells.
Tele-spam is a large chunk of change for them. They will fight tooth and
nail to keep them.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
